File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is setup. exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Five antivirus engines flagged this unsigned installer, while conflicting sandbox results and possible injection behavior warrant caution without establishing a specific malware…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 5 antivirus engines flag it and one sandbox test run rated it malicious while another found nothing.
Moderate evidence · More than one sign points to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't install it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already installed it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
5 of 70 flagged
- Flagged 5
- No detection 65
- No result 5
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 17d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The unsigned installer drew 5 of 75 engine detections, including one major generic trojan result and a crack-riskware label.
Five of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, with GData identifying generic PSEB trojan behavior and Malwarebytes identifying crack-related riskware. The detections lack strong family consensus, as only one major antivirus engine flagged it and the remaining major antivirus engines did not. Evidence from the test run is also divided: one sandbox returned a malicious result and another returned clean. The and mappings add concern, although no injected target process was recorded and the mapping alone does not prove injection. The executable is unsigned and recently observed, leaving no verified publisher identity to counterbalance these signals. Malware-specific external intelligence did not corroborate a named family, so the evidence supports caution rather than a definitive family attribution.
What We Detected
Five of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the installer. GData reported Generic.Trojan.PSEB.7149K8, Malwarebytes reported RiskWare.Crack, and three less reliable engines supplied generic malware or machine-learning labels. There is no strong family consensus, and 16 of 17 reporting major antivirus engines did not flag the file.
Threat Behavior
Two sandbox runs disagreed: one returned a malicious result and the other returned clean. No injected target process was identified, so these mappings are concerning but not conclusive. The two recorded domains were analysis-environment background contacts rather than sample-generated traffic.
What To Do Now
Do not run this installer on a production or personal system unless its origin and hash can be verified through the software publisher's official release channel. Keep security software enabled, and delete or let your antivirus remove the file if it came from a crack, repack, advertisement, or other untrusted download source.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- Only 5 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and 16 of 17 reporting major antivirus engines did not flag it.
- The second sandbox run returned clean, so the malicious runtime result lacks sandbox consensus.
- No malware-specific YARAify rules or MalwareBazaar record corroborated the detections.
- No inspected file it created has a saved malicious verdict; however, all six child verdicts remain unavailable.
- The observed domains were sandbox background traffic, not sample-generated connections.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Sixteen of 17 reporting major antivirus engines did not flag the file.
- A second sandbox run returned clean.
- No malware-specific research rules or known malware-exchange record matched the hash.
- No inspected file it created has a saved malicious result, although verdict coverage for all six children is unavailable.
- The antivirus analysis found no packer or high-entropy code.
- Five antivirus engines raised detections, including a major generic trojan label and a crack-riskware label.
- One of two sandbox runs produced a malicious result.
- The test run mapped possible process injection and access-token manipulation.
- The executable has no digital signature or established publisher history.
- The file was first observed on Oct 9, 2026.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 18sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 17filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
setup.exe
16f475bd8b0be20dd64d7faf49a9f59699e4dc2c14b436e5ed5b59d030936c35
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.exe
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-C7PR2.tmp\setup.tmp /SL5=$9014A,4978573,140800,C:\Users\<USER>\Downloads\setup.exe
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
setup.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\setup.exe"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
setup.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-C7PR2.tmp\setup.tmp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
_setup64.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\is-HNCLJ.tmp\_isetup\_setup64.tmp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 18 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 6 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
5 of the 70 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 5
- GData (major engine)Generic.Trojan.PSEB.7149K8
- BkavW32.Malware.E1E06090
- MalwarebytesRiskWare.Crack
- Paloaltogeneric.ml
- WebrootW32.Malware.Gen
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 11, 2026, 1:15 PM UTC
- SHA-256
16f475bd8b0be20dd64d7faf49a9f59699e4dc2c14b436e5ed5b59d030936c35- SHA-1
bc1e6c6e0cf3150518592de42751c3da194848bd- MD5
273825a6d6ef045c24421d4907a7c7d7
About this file
setup.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 5.6 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 5.6 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 9, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 70 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.55 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is setup.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is setup.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected setup.exe?
What should I do if I already installed setup.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of setup.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of setup.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.