File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.
Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this executable with a generic machine-learning label, while major antivirus engines and the combined sandbox verdict…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
1 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 70
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 3d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Trapmine alone flagged the executable with a generic machine-learning label; none of the other 75-engine total produced a detection. The combined sandbox verdict was clean, with no high-risk techniques, injected processes, persistence, or network contacts observed, making a false positive considerably more likely than malware.
Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, and that result came from a less reliable engine using a generic machine-learning label. All 18 reporting major antivirus engines produced no detection, and no malware family was identified. The combined sandbox verdict was clean, with no high-risk techniques, injected processes, persistence, dropped files, or sample-generated network contacts observed. Public threat databases and malware-specific community rules provided no corroborating signal. The executable is unsigned and lacks a long distribution history, so the evidence supports cautious use rather than absolute assurance.
What We Detected
Trapmine was the only engine to flag the file, assigning a generic machine-learning label. Just 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it reported a detection, while all 18 reporting major antivirus engines produced no detection and no malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox verdict was clean. The runs recorded no high-risk techniques, injected processes, persistence, dropped files, or sample-generated network contacts. The executable also showed no indication of packed high-entropy code. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available, although the sample itself made no observed network contacts.
What To Do Now
The isolated generic detection is most consistent with a false positive. Because the file is unsigned, first seen on Oct 23, 2026, and lacks an independent static inspection, obtain it from the expected source and keep security software enabled when opening it.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The executable is unsigned and was first seen on Oct 23, 2026, so its publisher and longer-term reputation cannot be established.
- Our static analysis of the uploaded bytes was unavailable, leaving the file's code and resources without an independent static inspection.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and the detection was a generic machine-learning label.
- All 18 reporting major antivirus engines produced no detection.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean and showed no high-risk techniques, injected processes, persistence, dropped files, or sample-generated network contacts.
- No public malware-database entry or malware-specific community rule matched the file.
- The executable showed no indication of packed high-entropy code.
- The executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- It was first seen on Oct 23, 2026 and has only 11 recorded submissions, providing limited long-term reputation.
- One less reliable engine assigned a generic machine-learning detection.
- An independent static inspection of the uploaded bytes was not available.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 3 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 3isolated sandbox runs
- 6sandbox rule tags
- 1spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 6 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- Trapminesuspicious.low.ml.score
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 23, 2026, 5:05 PM UTC
- SHA-256
6c64389adab98c16d875cb16334e9a1a2dd88d568f1558c1f03cf5afb5b98cf8- SHA-1
ed1bc6642214ebbc67f700fef866d6deeb5e73ce- MD5
0f7437f4aba86b47e28b1a513161225c
About this file
SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 59.9 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 59.9 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 23, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 11 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 7.28 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe safe?
What is SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe?
Is it safe to run SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of SHODAN Stat Editor Offline.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.