File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is POP2. EXE safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this 5.5 MB Windows executable, and four sandbox runs recorded no hostile activity, no packing and no dropped files.
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
No action is needed based on this evidence. Run it only if you trust its source, and keep your security software enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 10mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged POP2.EXE, including all 18 major ones. Four sandbox runs returned a combined clean verdict, with no injection, no dropped files and no hostile network contacts. It is unsigned, so there is no publisher to vouch for it.
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and the 18 major antivirus engines all reported clean. The combined sandbox verdict across four runs was clean. No high-risk techniques were corroborated, no processes were injected into and no files were dropped. The only network contact was background traffic from the analysis machine, and our host cross-check found nothing malicious. The file is built with Microsoft Visual C++, shows no sign of packing, and has no hits in MalwareBazaar, YARAify or CIRCL. It is unsigned and moderately prevalent, which limits confidence but gives no reason for suspicion.
What We Detected
No engine out of 75 flagged this Win32 executable, first seen on Dec 18, 2025. All 18 major antivirus engines reported it clean, and no external reference database holds a hit on it.
Threat Behavior
Four sandbox runs produced a combined clean verdict. The sample showed no injection, no persistence, no dropped files and no hostile network contacts; the single contact was the analysis machine's own background traffic. Its structure matches a normal Visual C++ build with no packer and ordinary entropy.
What To Do Now
Nothing in the evidence calls for action. As with any unsigned program, run it only if you trust where you got it, and keep your security software active.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file is unsigned and no publisher history exists, so nothing vouches for who built it.
- 35 submitters over 328 days is moderate prevalence, which is not proof of safety on its own.
- We have not inspected the file contents ourselves, so the assessment rests on engine and sandbox results.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No detections from 75 engines, including all 18 major ones.
- Clean combined sandbox verdict over four runs with no hostile behaviour.
- No packing, and no hits in MalwareBazaar, YARAify or CIRCL.
- The file is unsigned, so no publisher identity backs it.
- Prevalence is moderate, so wide use alone does not establish safety.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 4 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 4isolated sandbox runs
- 13sandbox rule tags
- 1spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 5filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 4 sandboxes and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
13MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1012
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1056· Keylogging
- T1056.001· Keylogging
- T1057· Lists programs
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1071· Application protocol
- T1082· System recon
- T1083· Scans your files
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1222
- T1497.001· Sandbox evasion
- T1614
Observed activity
Processes started
1Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
file.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\file.exe"
Files
1Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Security Health\Logs
Mutexes
4Named locks a program uses so only one copy runs; malware families often reuse them.
\BaseNamedObjects\Local\SM0:6908:304:WilStaging_02\BaseNamedObjects\Local\SM0:6908:120:WilError_03\BaseNamedObjects\Local\ZonesCacheCounterMutex\BaseNamedObjects\Local\ZonesLockedCacheCounterMutex
Sandbox background — not the file
2The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
SecurityHealthService.exeC:\Windows\System32\SecurityHealthService.exe C:\Windows\system32\SecurityHealthService.exe - VM host
nexusrules.officeapps.live.com
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 10, 2026, 6:59 PM UTC
- SHA-256
7db06c8dadc62acb893f746ee74adf3c7cb933c85576e3957a4a01565baac130- SHA-1
89672699f7420ac52bc9c09182216ff82f0180f8- MD5
a75eb1815db007a0bf807207fba24430
About this file
POP2.EXE says it is Prince of Persia : Warrior Within, 5.5 MB.
- Claims to be
- Prince of Persia : Warrior WithinFrom the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Original name
- POP2.EXEMatches the shared file name.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 5.5 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Dec 18, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 35 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.43 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 71 engines flagged this file
4 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust17 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
These identify the compiler, runtime or installer used to build the file. They are not packing and are not a risk signal on their own.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is POP2.EXE safe?
What is POP2.EXE?
How many antivirus engines detected POP2.EXE?
What is the SHA-256 hash of POP2.EXE?
Is it safe to run POP2.EXE?
How up to date is this analysis of POP2.EXE?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.