File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is gup. exe safe? Yes, no threats found.
This is the genuine signed Notepad++ updater, flagged by none of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it and widely distributed, so it is safe on its own.
Strong evidence · A verified publisher signature, and no engine flags it.
Safe when it comes from the official Notepad++ package. Do not run it if it arrived alongside unexpected extra DLL files or inside an unrelated download.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Notepad++
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it, and nearly 3,000 sources have submitted it. A split sandbox result and generic community rules do not outweigh that. The only real risk is a malicious DLL planted beside it.
The file carries a valid signature from Notepad++, a trusted publisher, and none of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flags it, including 18 major antivirus engines that all report clean. It has been submitted by about 2,900 sources since March 2025. The community rules that matched are generic anti-debug, certificate and compiler detectors. One sandbox run returned a malicious label while another returned clean, with no named injection target or other corroboration, which is typical of installer and updater behaviour. Community comments describe a bundle that pairs this genuine updater with a fake DLL; that threat lives in the extra DLL, not in these bytes.
What We Detected
No antivirus engine flags this file. It is signed by Notepad++ with a valid signature and matches a trusted publisher. It is also widely seen and consistent with a previous safe verdict for the same signer.
Threat Behavior
The sandbox summary was split, with no named injection target, no dropped files and no malicious contacted hosts. The network contacts are the analysis VM's own background traffic. Community comments warn that attackers sometimes ship this genuine updater next to a fake libcurl.dll that loads a payload. That scenario involves a separate malicious DLL, not the updater itself.
What To Do Now
Use it only from the official Notepad++ distribution. If it arrived in an unrelated download or alongside unexpected DLL files, do not run it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- One sandbox run returned a malicious label while another returned clean; the malicious run named no injection target and no corroborating artefact.
- A community comment describes a malware bundle that abuses the genuine signed Notepad++ updater by loading a fake libcurl.dll placed beside it; the updater itself is legitimate, but it can be misused in such sideloading bundles, so the file's surroundings matter.
- Another community note mentions the hash being associated with a dropper listing, but this is unverified and no public-database listing exists for this exact hash.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Valid signature from the trusted publisher Notepad++
- None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag the file
- Submitted by about 2,900 sources since March 2025
- A previous verdict for the same signer was also safe
- Genuine signed updaters can be abused through a malicious DLL placed beside them
- One sandbox run returned a malicious label that nothing corroborated
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 6 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 6isolated sandbox runs
- 13sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 4network contacts
- 2filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 6 sandboxes and the results were split: 1 returned "malicious" and 1 returned "clean".
Sandbox verdicts
2- VT: MALWAREmalicious
- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
13MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1010
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1059.001· Runs commands
- T1063
- T1071· Application protocol
- T1082· System recon
- T1083· Scans your files
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1198
- T1547.001· Auto-start
- T1574.002· Execution hijack
- T1614
Observed activity
Processes started
4Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
eaac64c113ebaba1fae924ad1b6239a44c8806bf2b85d8dc11a27ad65a981cc1.exe%SAMPLEPATH%\eaac64c113ebaba1fae924ad1b6239a44c8806bf2b85d8dc11a27ad65a981cc1.exeprogram.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\program.exe" -installprogram.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\program.exe" /installprogram.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\program.exe" /load
Network contacts
44 hosts, listed as 4 addresses. Links show the host and path only.
- IP address
23.197.238.105 - IP address
104.98.118.146 - IP address
23.215.176.154 - IP address
23.46.228.49
Files
2Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Deleted
C:\Windows\System32\wbem\Performance\WmiApRpl.h - Deleted
C:\Windows\System32\wbem\Performance\WmiApRpl.ini
Sandbox background — not the file
29The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
UI0Detect.exeC:\Windows\System32\UI0Detect.exe - VM process
updater.exeC:\Program Files\Google2876_276398069\bin\updater.exe - VM process
updater.exeC:\Program Files\Google712_788169743\bin\updater.exe - VM process
updater.exeC:\Program Files\Google424_1282964599\bin\updater.exe - VM process
updater.exeC:\Program Files\Google2984_732520156\bin\updater.exe - VM process
updater.exeC:\Program Files\Google2808_7649468\bin\updater.exe
Show all 29 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM injection target
\\?\C:\Windows\system32\wbem\WMIADAP.EXE - VM injection target
C:\Program Files\Google2876_276398069\bin\updater.exe - VM injection target
C:\Program Files\Google712_788169743\bin\updater.exe - VM injection target
C:\Program Files\Google424_1282964599\bin\updater.exe - VM injection target
C:\Program Files\Google2984_732520156\bin\updater.exe - VM host
www.microsoft.com - VM host
res.public.onecdn.static.microsoft - VM host
192.168.0.47 - VM host
20.99.133.109 - VM host
23.213.37.172 - VM host
192.168.0.82 - VM host
151.101.22.172 - VM host
20.99.186.246 - VM host
23.196.193.245 - VM host
20.69.140.28 - VM host
192.168.0.35 - VM host
23.55.140.42 - VM host
a83f:8110:0:0:b00:b00:2800:1800 - VM host
192.168.0.9 - VM host
192.168.0.26 - VM host
a83f:8110:0:0:4d88:21:0:0 - VM host
192.168.0.18 - VM host
23.196.145.221
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; signed by Notepad++.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 10, 2026, 4:40 PM UTC
- SHA-256
eaac64c113ebaba1fae924ad1b6239a44c8806bf2b85d8dc11a27ad65a981cc1- SHA-1
f61e771c53c63f35f5a2b416c260c74d29329adf- MD5
bca6478b230b6920fe79b97a3066e835
About this file
gup.exe says it is WinGup for Notepad++, 804.7 kB.
- Claims to be
- WinGup for Notepad++From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Original name
- gup.exeMatches the shared file name.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 804.7 kB
- Signer
- Notepad++Valid code signature.
- First seen
- Mar 8, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2,922 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.17 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 71 engines flagged this file
4 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust17 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Community YARA rules matched, but all of them are generic capability, anti-debug or compiler rules that ordinary software also matches. Worth noting, not on their own cause for alarm.
- cobalt_strike_tmp01925d3fgeneric
- DebuggerCheck__APIgeneric
- golang_bin_JCorn_CSC846generic
- pe_detect_tls_callbacksgeneric
- PE_Digital_Certificategeneric
- VECT_Ransomwaregeneric
- Sus_Obf_Enc_Spoof_Hide_PEgeneric
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 7 questions people ask most about this file.
Is gup.exe safe?
What is gup.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected gup.exe?
Is gup.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of gup.exe?
Is it safe to run gup.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of gup.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.