File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is larp-
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Java archive, sandbox runs produced a clean combined verdict, and about 287 sources have submitted it without…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
The evidence supports using this Java archive if it came from the official project source. Keep your security software enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the project's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 10
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
0 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This Java archive was first seen on Sep 22, 2026. None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including every major antivirus engine that analysed it. Four sandbox runs ended in a clean combined verdict, with no injection targets and no network contacts recorded.
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and all 18 major antivirus engines that reported returned no detection. No process injection target was recorded, and the sample made no network contacts. The technique mappings that appeared are common in legitimate software and lack supporting artefacts. Public malware-intelligence databases and community rule sets hold no listing or matching rule for this hash. About 287 distinct sources have submitted it, which is consistent with a commonly shared Java tool or mod.
What We Detected
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Java archive. The 18 major antivirus engines that analysed it all reported no detection. Public malware-intelligence databases and community rule sets hold no listing or matching rule for this hash.
Threat Behavior
Four sandbox runs launched the archive under Java on Windows and Linux. Their combined verdict was clean. No processes were injected and no high-risk techniques were confirmed. The archive did check its environment (debugger presence, CPU name), which ordinary software also does. No outbound network contacts were recorded, but no complete host-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
The evidence supports using this file if you obtained it from the project's official source. Keep your antivirus enabled. Only run Java archives that come from distributors you trust.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- A researcher comment links this hash to public malware-sample repositories. Those repositories collect files automatically, so a listing there does not label the file malicious.
- Sandbox tags note checks for debugging environments and the CPU name. Ordinary Java software also shows this, but evasive Java malware can do the same and stay undetected.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no injection or network contacts
- About 287 distinct sources have submitted the file
- No listing in public malware databases and no malware-specific rule matches
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 4 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 4isolated sandbox runs
- 16sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 24, 2026, 1:50 PM UTC
- SHA-256
84212d64556ba1d724b12def161ccf9d3118871edec02fe54c413e6ebd1eff44- SHA-1
1d07f93982f3a29a6f78fe3787af07100026f81a- MD5
a3db50f1730f7996fcd8e80a91a6f595
About this file
larp-v9-lite.jar is a JAR file of 1.1 MB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 1.1 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Sep 22, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 287 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is larp-v9-lite.jar safe?
What is larp-v9-lite.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected larp-v9-lite.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of larp-v9-lite.jar?
Is it safe to open or run larp-v9-lite.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of larp-v9-lite.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.