File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is CSResurgence-
An unsigned, game launcher installer flagged by 4 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it with only generic machine-learning labels, while sandbox runs showed ordinary…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
This installer appears to be a legitimate game launcher setup. Download it only from the project's official source and keep your security software enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Install it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
4 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 4
- No detection 67
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 4d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All four labels are generic machine-learning detections that name no malware family, and Sophos is the only major antivirus engine among them. Five sandbox runs showed a normal installer: it unpacked its components, created a launcher, an uninstaller and a Start Menu shortcut, and contacted no network hosts. The file is unsigned and very new, so download it only from the project's official source.
Detections are limited to Sophos's generic unwanted program label and three machine-learning engines, none of which names a malware family. Seventeen other major antivirus engines did not flag it. Across five sandbox runs we saw a standard installer that registers an uninstall entry and a URL handler, with no injection target, no network contacts and no high-risk techniques. No public malware database or malware-specific rule lists the file, and no dropped component was judged malicious. The file is unsigned and rare, which lowers our confidence, but nothing beyond generic machine-learning scoring points toward harm.
What We Detected
4 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file: Sophos (Generic ML unwanted program), DeepInstinct, APEX and Cylance. All four are generic machine-learning labels with no named family. The file carries no code signature and was first seen on Oct 22, 2026.
Threat Behavior
Five sandbox runs showed an installer extracting its plugins to a temporary folder. It then installed a launcher and an uninstaller under the user's local application data, added a Start Menu shortcut, and registered an uninstall entry and a custom URL handler. No processes were injected and no network contacts were recorded. Nothing in the runs showed persistence beyond the normal shortcut and uninstall registration.
What To Do Now
Download this installer only from the project's official release page and compare the file hash if the project publishes one. Keep your antivirus enabled while installing and running it.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The installer is unsigned and was first seen on Oct 22, 2026 with only two submitters, so its origin cannot be confirmed from a publisher signature or wide distribution.
- Sophos and three machine-learning engines flagged it. Their labels are generic, but they are not proof of a false positive.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 17 other major antivirus engines flagged it.
- Sandbox runs showed only standard installer activity and no network contacts.
- No public malware database or malware-specific rule lists this file.
- The file is not code-signed.
- It is very new and has been submitted by only two sources.
- Sophos and three machine-learning engines gave it generic detections.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 5 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 5isolated sandbox runs
- 26sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 21filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 26 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 8 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
4 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 4
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- Sophos (major engine)Generic ML PUA (PUA)
- APEXMalicious
- CylanceUnsafe
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 22, 2026, 7:26 PM UTC
- SHA-256
8afaa08eb6db05b73d1395c6bf41c6a8e5fb1c880c3b0aa1b9264c38c15804ef- SHA-1
cd7d31e3a0eb1cd2b4c5bd228c4609d20058ac96- MD5
bb8ac2955ba943b467b08614b68f137d
About this file
CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe says it is CS Resurgence, 4.0 MB.
- Claims to be
- CS ResurgenceFrom the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 4.0 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 22, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.05 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe safe?
What is CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe?
Is it safe to install CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of CSResurgence-0.3.5-setup.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.