File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is artcraft-
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this FreeBSD archive, though its short history (seen shortly before Oct 14, 2026) and lack of observation from the test…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Verify the SHA-256 against the project's official release channel before use. Keep security protections enabled and test the bundled ELF in isolation if the download source cannot be authenticated.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 62
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 12d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The static evidence is reassuring: none of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, including 17 major antivirus engines, and no malware-specific external intelligence matched it. The bundle contains an ELF executable and has only a short submission history, while no sandbox run or complete host-reputation check is available.
Seventeen major antivirus engines, including Kaspersky, Microsoft, ESET-NOD32, BitDefender, and Fortinet, reported no detection. MalwareBazaar and YARAify supplied no family or malware-specific rule corroboration. Code signing is not meaningful for the outer GZIP archive, so its absence does not count against it. Confidence is tempered because the file was first observed on Oct 13, 2026, contains an ELF executable, and has no completed observation from the test run or complete contacted-host reputation result.
What We Detected
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the GZIP archive, and all 17 reporting major antivirus engines returned no detection. No malware family label, MalwareBazaar match, or malware-specific YARAify rule was present.
Threat Behavior
The archive is tagged as a tar bundle containing an ELF executable. No completed sandbox run is available, so execution behavior was not observed, and no complete contacted-host reputation assessment is available.
What To Do Now
Obtain the archive from the project's official distribution channel and verify any published checksum before extraction. Keep security software enabled, inspect the extracted files, and run the executable only in an appropriately isolated FreeBSD environment if its origin is uncertain.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The archive contains an ELF executable and was first seen on Oct 13, 2026, so its clean static record has limited historical depth.
- No sandbox execution or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, leaving behavior in the test run unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it reported a detection.
- Seventeen major antivirus engines, including Kaspersky, Microsoft, ESET-NOD32, BitDefender, and Fortinet, reported no detection.
- No malware-specific researcher rules or known malware repository match were found.
- No suspicious filename disguise, brand conflict, or triggered rule was identified.
- The archive was first observed on Oct 13, 2026 and has a limited submission history.
- It contains an ELF executable whose behavior in the test run was not observed.
- No complete reputation assessment is available for any hosts the program might contact during execution.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 14, 2026, 5:48 PM UTC
- SHA-256
96c6eac0fb0ff76571c6142cb607190072793d20858b7edfe8e7320b4202291a- SHA-1
d5cd11ea40f67b20289d938a93def9e9ad89c2f5- MD5
be242d7aee56bc0ec6a781fb0f7faf7f
About this file
artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz is a GZIP file of 11.7 MB.
- Type and size
- GZIP · 11.7 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 13, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 4 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz safe?
What is artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz?
How many antivirus engines detected artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz?
What is the SHA-256 hash of artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz?
Is it safe to open or extract artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz?
How up to date is this analysis of artcraft-launcher-0.3.2-freebsd-x86_64.tar.gz?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.