File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Sportz
No antivirus engine detected the APK, and its broad submission history outweighs an uncorroborated direct-IP heuristic, though runtime and host-reputation coverage remain…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Use the APK only when obtained from an official, verifiable source and review its requested permissions before installation. Keep Android security protections enabled.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Install it only from Google Play or the developer's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 66 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 66
- No result 9
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All 66 antivirus engines that checked it avoided flagging this APK, including 16 major antivirus engines, and it has appeared across 900 submission sources. Obfuscation and 12 direct IP references merit awareness, but no completed sandbox run or host-reputation check is available to establish harmful activity.
Static scanning produced no malicious or suspicious detection among 75 engines, with 16 major antivirus engines reporting no detection. The APK also has substantial prevalence, appearing across 900 sources and 1,099 submissions. Its obfuscation and reflection tags are risk-relevant but do not independently demonstrate harmful intent. A direct-IP behaviour rule matched for 12 addresses, although there was no completed sandbox observation and no complete host-reputation result. Research feeds supplied no family or YARA corroboration, and no inspected child was identified as malware, leaving the overall evidence strongly favorable with limited runtime uncertainty.
What We Detected
No engine among 75 flagged the APK as malicious or suspicious. Sixteen major antivirus engines, including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft, reported no detection. The APK has also been submitted 1,099 times from 900 sources, indicating meaningful distribution.
Threat Behavior
The package carries obfuscation and reflection tags, and a rule noted 12 direct IP contacts. However, the absence of a sandbox run means there was no completed observation from the test run, while the missing contacted-host reputation result means no complete reputation result exists for those addresses. No high-risk MITRE technique, malicious child, YARA rule, or named malware family corroborated the heuristic.
What To Do Now
Install only if the APK came from the developer's official distribution channel and its requested Android permissions match its advertised purpose. Keep mobile security protection enabled and avoid sideloading if the source or package identity cannot be verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file's tag list includes obfuscated and reflection, which can conceal Android application logic but is also common in legitimate APKs.
- One of our behaviour rules fired after 12 direct IP contacts; without completed observation from the test run or host-reputation coverage, their purpose remains unresolved.
- 2 dropped files were looked up and no dropped file is known to be malicious, but both child verdicts are unknown rather than confirmed benign.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/66 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- Observed across 900 sources and 1,099 submissions.
- No high-risk techniques were identified.
- No malicious child or external-intelligence match was found.
- APK uses obfuscation and reflection.
- A medium-severity direct-IP rule identified 12 external IP addresses.
- No completed sandbox observation from the test run is available.
- Contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 3sandbox rule tags
- 0spawned processes
- 12network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 3 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 partial. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 8, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
- SHA-256
98afe8b8c22c96c3b1021bfd9432e660a7cfae209d5d308d21f41cb971d2f44f- SHA-1
7590d69b3ab5bb3c729206cc6b4ba505b04852de- MD5
3dd5c800082003e3c26a3cc1066feaa5
About this file
SportzX_3.2v.apk is an Android file of 20.9 MB.
- Type and size
- Android · 20.9 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 1, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 900 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is SportzX_3.2v.apk safe?
What is SportzX_3.2v.apk?
How many antivirus engines detected SportzX_3.2v.apk?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SportzX_3.2v.apk?
Is it safe to install SportzX_3.2v.apk?
How up to date is this analysis of SportzX_3.2v.apk?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.