Is rsclient.exe safe?
Only 3 of 75 engines raised generic low-trust alerts, while all 17 reporting tier-1 engines and the completed sandbox supplied no corroborating malware evidence.
The three detections come exclusively from low-trust engines and use generic labels, while all 17 reporting tier-1 engines remained silent. One completed sandbox observed only routine system-information discovery, with no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox conclusion, dropped files, or network contacts recorded.
ae9a52149ba2f61465…c3aa33c52a8dd1Recommended next actions
Before running
Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
If you already ran it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The three detections come exclusively from low-trust engines and use generic labels, while all 17 reporting tier-1 engines remained silent. One completed sandbox observed only routine system-information discovery, with no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox conclusion, dropped files, or network contacts recorded.
Only 3 of 75 engines flagged the executable, and all three detections came from low-trust engines using generic or machine-learning labels. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet, did not detect it. One completed sandbox observed T1082 system-information discovery, but no offensive techniques or malicious sandbox conclusion. No packer, high-entropy code, dropped files, or external-intelligence matches were found. The executable is unsigned, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so ordinary source verification remains appropriate.
What We Detected
Only 3 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the sample: Bkav, Cylance, and Trapmine. Each is classified as low-trust here, and their labels are generic rather than identifying a consistent malware family. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Avast, and Fortinet, did not detect the file.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run observed only T1082, a common system-information discovery action. It recorded no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox conclusion, persistence indicators, written files, dropped hashes, or network contacts. Static PE analysis also found no packer, likely packing, or high-entropy code. No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available, but the sandbox contact lists themselves were empty.
What To Do Now
The pattern strongly favors generic false alarms from low-trust engines. Because the executable is unsigned, obtain it from its expected official source, verify its SHA-256 value when the publisher provides one, and keep endpoint protection enabled while using it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- signing.signed=false for an executable where signing.applicable=true, so no publisher identity or certificate history supports the file.
- Bkav reported W32.Malware.86F697FF, Cylance reported Unsafe, and Trapmine reported malicious.high.ml.score, although all are low-trust generic detections.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete host-reputation cross-check is available, though the completed sandbox recorded no contacted domains, IPs, or URLs.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines did not detect the sample
- No offensive MITRE techniques or malicious sandbox conclusion
- No dropped files, persistence indicators, or recorded network contacts
- No packing or high-entropy code indicators
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match
- Unsigned Win32 executable with no verified publisher identity
- Three generic low-trust antivirus detections
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check was saved
Use the file only if it came from the expected official source, and verify its SHA-256 where possible. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete3 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 1MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
rsclient.exe
ae9a52149ba2f61465fcd2b06c6b64ec174375585481494d13c3aa33c52a8dd1
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\rsclient.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\rsclient.exe"
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
3 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 3 / 75engines flagged
- 453sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
3 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including Bkav and Cylance.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 479 times from 453 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 03
Scanned file: rsclient.exe — ae9a52149ba2f61465fcd2b06c6b64ec174375585481494d13c3aa33c52a8dd1
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 04
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\rsclient.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\user\Desktop\rsclient.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
3 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- rsclient.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 64.0 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 10, 2026, 5:44 AM UTC
ae9a52149ba2f61465fcd2b06c6b64ec174375585481494d13c3aa33c52a8dd1Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is rsclient.exe safe?
What is rsclient.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected rsclient.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of rsclient.exe?
Is it safe to run rsclient.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of rsclient.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.