File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is iThmb
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this small Windows program, five sandbox runs finished clean, and every checked network host came back harmless.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Widely seen for a long time, and nothing harmful found.
No action is needed for this file, and there is no need to change any protection settings on your device. Keep your antivirus enabled and only run copies obtained from the source you trust.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 72 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 72
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 15y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no process injection, no persistence and no remote control traffic, and the network hosts we checked showed nothing harmful. Two community detection patterns matched, but they look like generic or demo signatures and nothing else backs them.
Across the antivirus engines no engine reported this file as malicious or suspicious, and all 18 major antivirus engines returned a clean result. Observation from the test run is the strongest part of the case here: the combined sandbox verdict was clean, with no injected processes, no persistence entries, no program markers and no unusual high-risk techniques — the techniques recorded are the ones legitimate installers and utilities routinely produce. The network side is equally quiet: eleven hosts were checked against our reputation data and none were known-malicious or known-suspicious, and every domain and address seen during analysis is ordinary analysis-machine background traffic rather than something the sample reached out to. The only adverse item is two community detection patterns matching, one of them a demo rule and the other aimed at macro documents, which this portable executable does not contain. With 133 distinct submitters since February 2011, no packing and low code entropy, the remaining signals point to an ordinary legacy utility.
What We Detected
This is a small Windows executable (about 105 KB) first seen on Feb 7, 2011. None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, and the 18 highest-trust engines all returned a clean verdict. The file is not compressed or packed, its code section sits at normal entropy, and nothing in its structure suggests obfuscation.
Two community detection patterns matched during reputation lookups. One is explicitly a demonstration rule and the other targets macro documents, which this executable is not. No engine on either of our top two trust tiers picks the file up, and the analysis runs found nothing to corroborate them, so they read as coincidental pattern matches rather than evidence of a real threat.
Threat Behavior
Five sandbox runs were completed and the combined result was clean. The runs recorded no injection into other processes, no persistence through the registry or startup locations, no program markers and no credential or defence-tampering artefacts. The behaviour that was logged — reading system information, ordinary network calls and library loading — is the same set of techniques seen in everyday software.
Network activity was limited to analysis-machine background traffic: the domains and addresses observed during the runs are the analysis environment's own contacts, not the program's. We checked eleven hosts against our reputation data and none were known to be harmful.
What To Do Now
No action is needed for this file. Because it is an old, unsigned program, keep security software switched on when you run it and download it only from the place you originally obtained it, so you know exactly which copy you are using.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Two community malware-detection patterns still matched these bytes; if they describe real code rather than a coincidental pattern, that would be missed by the engines here.
- The program carries no digital signature and dates from 2011, so there is no publisher identity to confirm who built it or that the file is unmodified since release.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and all 18 major antivirus engines returned a clean result.
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no process injection, persistence or remote control traffic.
- Eleven checked network hosts showed no malicious or suspicious reputation entries.
- 133 distinct submitters have sent this file since February 2011, which fits widely shared, long-lived software.
- The executable is neither packed nor obfuscated, with normal code entropy and no high-entropy sections.
- The file has no digital signature, so its publisher and integrity cannot be confirmed.
- It is a 2011-era binary, which means it was built without modern compiler hardening.
- Two community malware-detection patterns matched these bytes, although nothing else in the analysis backs them.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 5 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 5isolated sandbox runs
- 5sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 2network contacts
- 4filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 5 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 1 dropped file.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 6, 2026, 6:15 AM UTC
- SHA-256
c0f09368e72de67debc6f323cefb3f43a1edbba7d5c55a1a0fa4f5d476122e4b- SHA-1
ae8c69650e1c252bcac19f1c556b7daca07d1c2d- MD5
1754ce1398a4260a2fe2758daa5423aa
About this file
iThmbConv.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 108.0 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 108.0 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Feb 7, 2011On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 133 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.80 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (76), 2 matched signature rules, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is iThmbConv.exe safe?
What is iThmbConv.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected iThmbConv.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of iThmbConv.exe?
Is it safe to run iThmbConv.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of iThmbConv.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.