File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Qazr-
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, and its completed sandbox run found no harmful outcome despite two unconfirmed offensive-technique mappings.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Use the JAR only if it came from the expected source, and verify its SHA-256 with the publisher when possible. Keep security protection enabled and consider isolated testing because the file is newly observed.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the project's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 66 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 66
- No result 9
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 16d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it detected the file, including 17 major antivirus engines, and the completed sandbox run returned clean. Possible injection and service-creation mappings warrant some caution because the file is but no injected process, persistence artifact, malicious child, or malware-specific research rule was established.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 engines, including all 17 reporting major antivirus engines. One completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no sample network contacts, injected targets, or persistence indicators. The and mappings are cautionary, but the saved evidence does not identify a target process, injection method, or persistent service created by the sample. No malware-specific YARA rule or known malicious child corroborates those mappings. Confidence is moderated because the JAR is from one source, seven files it created remain unclassified, and no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
What We Detected
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, including 17 major antivirus engines. Research feeds produced no malware-specific YARA match or malware-repository match.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean. It mapped T1055 and T1543.002, but no injected process, persistence indicator, or sample network contact was recorded. These mappings therefore remain unconfirmed behavioral warnings rather than proof of harmful activity. Seven written or extracted files have no saved verdict, and no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
What To Do Now
The file is and has little reputation history, so obtain it only from the expected developer or distribution channel. Keep security software enabled, verify the hash with the publisher if possible, and test it in an isolated environment before using it on an important system.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- The runtime mapping includes possible process injection and service-related activity, but it identifies neither an injected process nor a persistence artifact.
- The file is from one source, so the lack of antivirus detections may partly reflect limited exposure.
- Seven written or extracted files lack saved verdicts, leaving their nature unresolved.
- No complete reputation cross-check is available for runtime hosts, although the recorded run lists no sample contacts.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including 17 major antivirus engines.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean.
- No injected target process or persistence artifact was recorded.
- No malware-specific research rule or malware-repository match was found.
- No file it created has an established harmful classification.
- The JAR was first observed very recently and has only one known submission.
- The sandbox mapped possible process injection and service-related activity without enough detail to confirm either action.
- Seven files created or extracted during analysis do not yet have saved classifications.
- A complete reputation check for any runtime hosts is unavailable.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 9filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 2 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 9, 2026, 6:43 PM UTC
- SHA-256
ce7b951d35f814692c65bcf54f8562606a4ccfdccbff88e9d7c2f1ac8e2a58b4- SHA-1
7d06ec3e483d0dfed557a853424159ca1e01b718- MD5
f44c3c280d98bde4c2b9edbcb6360d92
About this file
Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar is a JAR file of 217.8 kB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 217.8 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 9, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar safe?
What is Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar?
Is it safe to open or run Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of Qazr-Addons-1.0.0.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.