Is WandEnhancer.exe safe?
No antivirus engine detected this unsigned executable, but its brand-new reputation and lack of runtime evidence warrant caution until its source is verified.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and static PE analysis found no obvious packing. However, the executable is unsigned, has been submitted only once, and has no completed sandbox observation, so its behavior and origin remain insufficiently established.
f756751d309e65f918…e585f73c10825aRecommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and static PE analysis found no obvious packing. However, the executable is unsigned, has been submitted only once, and has no completed sandbox observation, so its behavior and origin remain insufficiently established.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 antivirus engines, including all 17 participating tier-1 engines. Static PE analysis also found neither a recognized packer nor high-entropy code. Counterbalancing that, the executable is unsigned and was first observed with only one submission, leaving no meaningful reputation history. No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime actions cannot be characterized. The contacted-host reputation check is also unavailable, and broad file-type similarity to unrelated programs adds little confidence.
What We Detected
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the executable, including 17 tier-1 engines. The PE structure does not show a recognized packer, likely packing, or high-entropy code.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so process activity, persistence, network communication, and other runtime behavior were not observed. A complete contacted-host reputation result is also unavailable.
What To Do Now
Confirm that the file came directly from the expected developer or an official distribution channel before running it. Keep endpoint protection enabled, and consider waiting for stronger reputation or testing it in an isolated analysis environment if the source cannot be verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The 0/75 detection result is favorable, but file.ageDays=0 means signatures and reputation may not yet reflect the sample.
- No suspicious packing was identified, although static structure alone cannot establish what the executable does at runtime.
- Three similarHashes entries were previously marked 'safe', but they match only the broad Win32 executable file type and involve unrelated signed publishers.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus detections
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection
- No recognized packer
- No high-entropy code
- No external-intelligence matches
- Unsigned Windows executable
- First observed with only one submission
- No established publisher or signer history
- No completed runtime observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation result
Run it only if its download source and publisher can be independently verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled and avoid granting administrative privileges unless the software clearly requires them.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
ProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- WandEnhancer.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 1.9 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 11, 2026, 12:06 PM UTC
f756751d309e65f91821abc7675000f15c4f519e558f6f3dace585f73c10825aSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is WandEnhancer.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is WandEnhancer.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected WandEnhancer.exe?
What should I do if I already ran WandEnhancer.exe?
How do I remove WandEnhancer.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of WandEnhancer.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of WandEnhancer.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.