Is 66.132.195.46 safe?
http://66.132.195.46/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Dangerous IP address with extensive malicious and abusive activity detections
This address does not have enough page evidence to identify a specific consumer scam or commercial scheme. However, 14 of 93 security checks classified it as malicious, three more marked it suspicious, and its hosting address has a 100/100 abuse-confidence score based on 1,924 saved reports. Those findings make direct interaction dangerous despite the absence of a current browser warning.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address does not have enough page evidence to identify a specific consumer scam or commercial scheme. However, 14 of 93 security checks classified it as malicious, three more marked it suspicious, and its hosting address has a 100/100 abuse-confidence score based on 1,924 saved reports. Those findings make direct interaction dangerous despite the absence of a current browser warning.
Strong technical danger signals
Twelve independent antivirus families returned adverse results, while the broader saved scan recorded 14 malicious and three suspicious detections across 93 checks.
The hosting address also carries a maximum abuse-confidence score of 100/100 across 1,924 saved reports. Separate research records an unauthorized HTTP request attributed to this address.
No verified storefront or scam flow
The available evidence does not establish a specific sales funnel, login trap, download, or payment flow, so no consumer-scam category can be assigned responsibly.
A current browser reputation check returned no threat warning, but the saved TLS check did not validate the connection. Neither result outweighs the numerous malicious detections and abuse reports.
Why the score is 12
12 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
17/ 93
detectionsFresh result
17 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 14
- Suspicious
- 3
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| ADMINUSLabsMalicious | malicious |
| BitDefenderMalicious | malware |
| CertegoMalicious | malicious |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Criminal IPMalicious | malicious |
| CyRadarMalicious | malicious |
| FortinetMalicious | malware |
| G-DataMalicious | malware |
| GuardpotMalicious | malicious |
| IPsumMalicious | malicious |
| LionicMalicious | malicious |
| SOCRadarMalicious | malicious |
| SophosMalicious | malware |
| VIPREMalicious | malware |
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | suspicious |
| BlockListSuspicious | suspicious |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - malicious - Malicious
- BitDefender - malware - Malicious
- Certego - malicious - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
- Criminal IP - malicious - Malicious
- CyRadar - malicious - Malicious
- Fortinet - malware - Malicious
- G-Data - malware - Malicious
- Guardpot - malicious - Malicious
- IPsum - malicious - Malicious
- Lionic - malicious - Malicious
- SOCRadar - malicious - Malicious
- Sophos - malware - Malicious
- VIPRE - malware - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - suspicious - Suspicious
- BlockList - suspicious - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - clean - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- Cluster25 - unrated - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESET - clean - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - unrated - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - clean - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - unrated - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- SafeToOpen - unrated - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- Synthient - unrated - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Webroot - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for 66.132.195.46 because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for 66.132.195.46, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- IPThreatopen
"Unauthorized activity to HTTP: GET /lycxdqx38jlkra"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domain66.132.195.46
- Redirects to66.132.195.46
- Hosted byCensys, Inc.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
Additional evidence review
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 17 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Sep 28, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result17 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · Sep 28, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailable
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 66.132.195.46 a scam or a legit website?
Is 66.132.195.46 safe to use?
I already paid or entered my details on 66.132.195.46 — what should I do?
Can I get my money back from 66.132.195.46?
Is my device at risk after visiting 66.132.195.46?
How do I report 66.132.195.46?
66.132.195.46 looks professional — how can it still be a scam?
Has 66.132.195.46 been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is 66.132.195.46 on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Where is 66.132.195.46 hosted?
How often is the 66.132.195.46 report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Dangerous IP address with extensive malicious and abusive activity detections
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
This address does not have enough page evidence to identify a specific consumer scam or commercial scheme. However, 14 of 93 security checks classified it as malicious, three more marked it suspicious, and its hosting address has a 100/100 abuse-confidence score based on 1,924 saved reports. Those findings make direct interaction dangerous despite the absence of a current browser warning.
09 · Community