Is immortal.st safe?
http://immortal.st/
Coveragecomplete3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Immortal.st is dangerous and shows strong phishing indicators
Immortal.st presents a browser-verification challenge before allowing access, while current scans show 12 malicious detections and one suspicious detection across 92 engines. Although it has a valid encrypted connection and no current Safe Browsing warning, those checks do not outweigh the broader malicious and phishing classifications.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Immortal.st presents a browser-verification challenge before allowing access, while current scans show 12 malicious detections and one suspicious detection across 92 engines. Although it has a valid encrypted connection and no current Safe Browsing warning, those checks do not outweigh the broader malicious and phishing classifications.
Strong security warnings
The saved scan recorded 12 malicious and one suspicious detection across 92 engines, and 11 independent antivirus families returned adverse results.
External research also classified the site as phishing based on multiple risk signals, including 15 blacklist detections and phishing-related indicators.
A verification gate hides the destination
The observed page says it is protected by “EggyWall” and asks visitors to enter blue text to continue. The evidence identifies this as a browser-verification and credential-harvesting gate, but it does not reveal the content beyond that challenge.
One research result describes the behavior as a credential-theft sequence involving impersonation, urgency and a final data request. Because the underlying destination was not directly observed here, visitors should not enter credentials or other sensitive information.
Encryption does not establish trust
The site had a valid encrypted connection, and Safe Browsing returned no threat warning at the time checked. These are limited technical positives: encryption only protects data in transit, while the lack of one warning does not negate the numerous adverse detections.
Why the score is 15
11 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
13/ 92
detectionsFresh result
13 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 12
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiMalicious | phishing |
| BitDefenderMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| CyRadarMalicious | phishing |
| FortinetMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| GridinsoftMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| SafeToOpenMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | malware |
| WebrootMalicious | malicious |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - phishing - Malicious
- BitDefender - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - malicious - Malicious
- CyRadar - phishing - Malicious
- Fortinet - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Gridinsoft - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- SafeToOpen - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - malware - Malicious
- Webroot - malicious - Malicious
- ESET - suspicious - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - unrated - Clean
- Abusix - clean - Clean
- Acronis - clean - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - clean - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - clean - Clean
- AlienVault - clean - Clean
- AlphaSOC - unrated - Clean
- Antiy-AVL - clean - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- AutoShun - unrated - Clean
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - unrated - Clean
- Bkav - unrated - Clean
- BlockList - clean - Clean
- Blueliv - clean - Clean
- Certego - clean - Clean
- ChainPatrol - unrated - Clean
- CINS Army - clean - Clean
- CRDF - clean - Clean
- Criminal IP - unrated - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - unrated - Clean
- CTX AI - clean - Clean
- Cyan - unrated - Clean
- Cyble - clean - Clean
- desenmascara.me - clean - Clean
- DNS8 - unrated - Clean
- Dr.Web - clean - Clean
- EmergingThreats - clean - Clean
- Emsisoft - clean - Clean
- Ermes - unrated - Clean
- ESTsecurity - clean - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - clean - Clean
- Fortra - unrated - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- Google Safe Browsing - clean - Clean
- GreenSnow - clean - Clean
- GreyNoise - unrated - Clean
- Guardpot - unrated - Clean
- Heimdal Security - clean - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - unrated - Clean
- IPsum - clean - Clean
- Juniper Networks - clean - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - unrated - Clean
- Kaspersky - clean - Clean
- LevelBlue - clean - Clean
- Lumu - unrated - Clean
- Malwared - clean - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - clean - Clean
- MalwareURL - unrated - Clean
- Mimecast - unrated - Clean
- Netcraft - unrated - Clean
- OpenPhish - clean - Clean
- PhishFort - unrated - Clean
- Phishing Database - clean - Clean
- Phishtank - clean - Clean
- PREBYTES - clean - Clean
- PrecisionSec - unrated - Clean
- Quick Heal - clean - Clean
- Quttera - clean - Clean
- Rising - clean - Clean
- Sangfor - clean - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - unrated - Clean
- Scantitan - clean - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - clean - Clean
- Seclookup - clean - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - unrated - Clean
- SOCRadar - unrated - Clean
- StopForumSpam - clean - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - clean - Clean
- Synthient - unrated - Clean
- ThreatHive - clean - Clean
- URLhaus - clean - Clean
- URLQuery - unrated - Clean
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - clean - Clean
- ViriBack - clean - Clean
- VX Vault - clean - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - clean - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - clean - Clean
- ZeroCERT - clean - Clean
- ZeroFox - unrated - Clean
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual warning signs were identified
Browser Verification. This site is protected by EggyWall. Please enter the blue text shown below to continue.
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Browser Verification. This site is protected by EggyWall. Please enter the blue text shown below to continue.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as login portal, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Login Portal
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 0111 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result.
- 02Twelve engines marked the site malicious and one marked it suspicious among 92 results.
- 03Research evidence classifies the site as phishing and describes a credential-theft flow.
Web research findings
Independent findings for immortal.st, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Gridinsoftopen
"This site is classified as Phishing based on multiple risk signals, including 15 blacklist detections, a very young domain (4 months), and phishing-related signals."
- Gridinsoftopen
"We flagged Immortal.st as phishing. The page behavior matches a common credential-theft flow: impersonation first, urgency second, data request last."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainimmortal.st
- Redirects toimmortal.st
- Hosted byGHOSTnet
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://immortal.st/
- 2401https://immortal.st/
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
maliciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
Additional evidence review · Additional evidence review
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
Additional evidence review
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 13 of 92 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · Sep 28, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | Not available |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | Not available |
- Antivirus
- Result13 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · Sep 28, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- FreshnessNot available
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is immortal.st a scam or a legit website?
Is immortal.st safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to immortal.st?
Can I get my money back from immortal.st?
Did immortal.st steal my password or personal information?
How do I report immortal.st?
Why does immortal.st look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has immortal.st been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is immortal.st on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Where is immortal.st hosted?
How often is the immortal.st report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Immortal.st is dangerous and shows strong phishing indicators
Immortal.st presents a browser-verification challenge before allowing access, while current scans show 12 malicious detections and one suspicious detection across 92 engines. Although it has a valid encrypted connection and no current Safe Browsing warning, those checks do not outweigh the broader malicious and phishing classifications.
09 · Community