Is bakker.com safe?
http://bakker.com/
Coveragestrong3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Bakker.com is a long-established online garden centre with real checkout flows, but customer complaints about dead or damaged plants and slow support responses are a genuine service risk.
Bakker.com presents itself as an online garden centre ("Jardinerie en Ligne") with a 4.5/5 customer rating claim, secure payment messaging and delivery from €4.90, and it runs a normal shopping cart with "Ajouter au panier" and "Voir mon panier" controls. The domain is very old — the registrable domain is 11,189 days old — and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, with a valid encrypted connection. Against that, independent review evidence describes customers receiving withered, damaged or pest-infested plants, deliveries that arrived damaged or never arrived, and one reviewer saying dead plants were not taken seriously for almost two months. The site's captured pages also show no direct contact email, no phone number and no operator postal address, which makes resolving those problems harder. This is not a fake shop or a technical threat; it is a real retailer with a documented customer-service and product-quality problem, which places it in the Moderate Risk band.
Be the first to review bakker.com
Lost money to bakker.com? Warn others
Did you buy from bakker.com?
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Follow bakker.com
Get a notification in your MalwareTips bell when new reviews arrive (one digest a day at most), when the verdict changes after a rescan, and when MalwareTips or the verified site owner replies. Unfollow any time.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Bakker.com presents itself as an online garden centre ("Jardinerie en Ligne") with a 4.5/5 customer rating claim, secure payment messaging and delivery from €4.90, and it runs a normal shopping cart with "Ajouter au panier" and "Voir mon panier" controls. The domain is very old — the registrable domain is 11,189 days old — and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, with a valid encrypted connection. Against that, independent review evidence describes customers receiving withered, damaged or pest-infested plants, deliveries that arrived damaged or never arrived, and one reviewer saying dead plants were not taken seriously for almost two months. The site's captured pages also show no direct contact email, no phone number and no operator postal address, which makes resolving those problems harder. This is not a fake shop or a technical threat; it is a real retailer with a documented customer-service and product-quality problem, which places it in the Moderate Risk band.
What customers report about plants and support
Independent review evidence describes a recurring pattern of product-quality problems. One source reports many complaints about plant quality, with some customers receiving withered, damaged or pest-infested plants, and deliveries that were sometimes damaged or never arrived. A separate reviewer states they were sent plants that had been dead for around two weeks and that their email about it was not taken seriously for almost two months.
Those complaints are made harder to resolve by the site's own captured pages, which show no direct contact email, no phone number and no operator postal address. A shopper who receives a dead plant therefore has no obvious first-line channel on the page itself to request a replacement or refund.
Technical checks are clean; the risk is commercial, not malicious
There is no technical threat signal here. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. One antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious, but that comes from a saved, stale observation from a single engine and is not corroborated by the other services, so it should not be read as proof of malware or phishing.
The domain itself is long established — the registrable domain is 11,189 days old — which is consistent with a real, operating retailer rather than a throwaway storefront. The concern is therefore operator and customer risk: product quality and the difficulty of reaching support, not a malicious payload or a credential-harvesting page.
Why the score is 62
One customer complaint on a public review site: "Aan de andere kant waren er ook veel klachten over de kwaliteit van de planten, waarbij sommige klanten verdorde, beschadigde of door ongedierte aangevreten…". Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 92
detectionsSaved analysis from October 4, 2026 - stale
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- Gridinsoft - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Bakker.com, Jardinerie en Ligne, 4,5/5 Avis client, Paiement sécurisé, Livraison dès 4,90€
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Bakker.com, Jardinerie en Ligne, 4,5/5 Avis client, Paiement sécurisé, Livraison dès 4,90€
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Jardinerie en Ligne | Achat Plantes en Ligne | Bakker.com
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 60 antivirus results.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Shop
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The registrable domain is 11,189 days old, consistent with a long-running real retailer rather than a new throwaway storefront.
- 02The browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
- 031 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
If this is a scam — what it means for you
What happens when you actually order
A visitor adds a plant to the cart using the "Ajouter au panier" control and then reviews it via "Voir mon panier", which is a standard same-site checkout flow with no cross-domain redirect or off-site payment hop visible in the captured evidence.
If this is a scam, how it works
The evidence-backed path
Each stage below is preserved from the grounded analysis and linked to saved evidence.
The evidence-backed outcome after ordering is the risk: a reviewer reports receiving plants that had been dead for around two weeks and waiting almost two months for their complaint to be taken seriously. That is a delivery-and-support exposure, not a payment-diversion or malware exposure.
You can shop here, but treat it as a moderate-risk purchase. Before ordering anything expensive or time-sensitive, look for the site's own contact and returns information and keep your order confirmation, because the captured pages do not show a direct email, phone number or postal address. If a plant arrives dead or damaged, complain in writing immediately and keep the correspondence, since one reviewer reported a nearly two-month delay before being taken seriously. Pay by a method that gives you chargeback rights rather than an irreversible transfer.
Web research findings
Independent findings for bakker.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Trustpilotopen
"Aan de andere kant waren er ook veel klachten over de kwaliteit van de planten, waarbij sommige klanten verdorde, beschadigde of door ongedierte aangevreten planten ontvingen. De levering liet soms te wensen over, met planten die beschadigd aankwamen of helemaal niet werden geleverd. Verschillende reviewers waren ontevreden over de klantenservice, die moeilijk te bereiken was en trage of onbevredigende reacties gaf."
- Trustpilotopen
"They sent me dead (like dead for 2 weeks) plants. When I wrote email with this info, I wasn't taken seriously for almost 2 months."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainbakker.com
- Redirects tofr-fr.bakker.com
- Hosted byShopify, Inc.
- Referencesbakker.com · nl-be.bakker.com
Domain Timeline
- Mar 6, 1996Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 30 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 24, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
- No phone number listed on the captured page.
- No operator postal address visible on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://bakker.com/
- 2302https://bakker.com/
- 3200https://fr-fr.bakker.com/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One customer complaint on a public review site: "Aan de andere kant waren er ook veel klachten over de kwaliteit van de planten, waarbij sommige klanten verdorde, beschadigde of door ongedierte aangevreten…" · The captured pages show no direct contact email, no phone number and no operator postal address, making support and refund requests harder.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 4, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 24, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 4, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 24, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is bakker.com a scam or is it safe?
Is bakker.com safe to use?
Has bakker.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is bakker.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the bakker.com domain?
Does bakker.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is bakker.com hosted?
How often is the bakker.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Bakker.com is a long-established online garden centre with real checkout flows, but customer complaints about dead or damaged plants and slow support responses are a genuine service risk.
Bakker.com presents itself as an online garden centre ("Jardinerie en Ligne") with a 4.5/5 customer rating claim, secure payment messaging and delivery from €4.90, and it runs a normal shopping cart with "Ajouter au panier" and "Voir mon panier" controls. The domain is very old — the registrable domain is 11,189 days old — and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, with a valid encrypted connection. Against that, independent review evidence describes customers receiving withered, damaged or pest-infested plants, deliveries that arrived damaged or never arrived, and one reviewer saying dead plants were not taken seriously for almost two months. The site's captured pages also show no direct contact email, no phone number and no operator postal address, which makes resolving those problems harder. This is not a fake shop or a technical threat; it is a real retailer with a documented customer-service and product-quality problem, which places it in the Moderate Risk band.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of bakker.com?Verify and reply