Is c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com safe?
http://c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 5 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (58 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Unidentified host on a random 64-character domain that refused all connections, so nothing about its purpose could be verified
This address is a single-letter subdomain of a registrable domain made of 64 random hex characters, with no brand, business name or readable purpose. When our scan requested the page, the server refused the connection, so no page text, contact details, terms or checkout flow were reviewed. One antivirus engine out of 93 marked the URL as suspicious while 57 returned harmless, and the browser threat feed showed no warning. With the site unreadable and no independent research turning up anything about it, the score sits in the moderate band rather than Safe.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 55/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 2 findings pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Moderate1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious.-32 pts
- MinorThe server refused the connection, so no page, contact, About or policy text was reviewed and the site's purpose is unknown.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe host is a single-letter subdomain of a 64-hex-character domain with no brand or business meaning, and no search result references it.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for the URL.
- SupportsThe hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across no saved reports.
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 87 to 55 and split those 32 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
This address is a single-letter subdomain of a registrable domain made of 64 random hex characters, with no brand, business name or readable purpose. When our scan requested the page, the server refused the connection, so no page text, contact details, terms or checkout flow were reviewed. One antivirus engine out of 93 marked the URL as suspicious while 57 returned harmless, and the browser threat feed showed no warning. With the site unreadable and no independent research turning up anything about it, the score sits in the moderate band rather than Safe.
A random-looking host that would not serve a page
The hostname is a 'c.' subdomain of a domain consisting of a 64-character hexadecimal string. That naming carries no brand or business meaning, and no search result returned any page, review, complaint or directory entry mentioning either the host or the parent domain.
Our request to the origin server was refused outright, so the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was never reviewed. Whether this address serves a shop, a login page, a redirector, an API endpoint or nothing at all is unknown from the evidence available.
Thin technical signals, no operator information at all
The antivirus picture is mixed and weak: a single engine flagged the URL as suspicious, while the large majority of engines returned harmless or undetected, and the browser threat feed issued no threat warning. That is not a vendor consensus and not a confirmed detection.
The hosting IP carries an abuse confidence score of 0 out of 100 across no saved reports, and the parent domain is 537 days old, which says nothing about how long this particular subdomain has existed. A valid TLS certificate exists for the host, but the address we reached was served over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, so the connection was unencrypted.
No operator identity, ownership record, contact channel or commercial relationship could be established, because there was no readable content to examine and no external record of the name. The absence of complaints here reflects an unreadable, unindexed host, not a clean record.
Why the score is 55
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsFresh result
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- alphaMountain.ai - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Unrated
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekernewly registered websites
- Googletechnology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
The search completed without a material external warning or corroborating report.
What remains unverified
1 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too.
Infrastructure map
- Domainc.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com
- Redirects toc.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com
- Hosted byServers.com B.V.
Domain Timeline
- May 16, 2025Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 1.4 years old when this review was saved.
- Nov 4, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com.
Server Reputation
Sites linked to this one
Other sites we have reports for that share something checkable with this one. A shared detail is a lead to compare, not proof that the sites have the same owner or the same risk; each keeps its own rating.
On the same server IP
Also served from 185.106.140.166 (Servers.com B.V.). Unrelated sites can share a server, so this is a lead, not proof.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 antivirus result marked the URL as suspicious.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
The server refused the connection, so no page, contact, About or policy text was reviewed and the site's purpose is unknown.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Nov 4, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 4, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | The search completed without a material external finding | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Nov 4, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Nov 4, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 4, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- ResultThe search completed without a material external finding
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Nov 4, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Answered from the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com a scam or is it safe?
Is c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com safe to use?
Has c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com domain?
Does c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com hosted?
How often is the c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Unidentified host on a random 64-character domain that refused all connections, so nothing about its purpose could be verified
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
This address is a single-letter subdomain of a registrable domain made of 64 random hex characters, with no brand, business name or readable purpose. When our scan requested the page, the server refused the connection, so no page text, contact details, terms or checkout flow were reviewed. One antivirus engine out of 93 marked the URL as suspicious while 57 returned harmless, and the browser threat feed showed no warning. With the site unreadable and no independent research turning up anything about it, the score sits in the moderate band rather than Safe.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of c.c4af99d202e5a3526817eafe353ba8230aeb3b7687a7508d22e68f32.com?Verify and reply