Is call.com safe?
http://call.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 92 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Call.com is an established calling service, but customer-service and renewal concerns warrant caution
The site presents an app-based second-number service with rates and links to its listings on major app stores. Its long-standing domain and clean current browser-security and connection checks are reassuring, but one customer complaint describes an unsuccessful number renewal, an unexpected KYC requirement, expiration of the number, and rude support. That mixed record supports a Moderate Risk score rather than a scam classification.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 68/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 3 findings pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- ModerateOne customer complaint on a public review site: "My Experience With Call.com has been horrible.. I cant Recommend to any User especially Africans. They stereotype a lot, rude customer support. Bought a number…"
- Moderate2 antivirus results marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- MinorNo direct contact email was found on the captured page.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe domain has been registered for more than 11,000 days.
- SupportsCurrent checks found no browser threat warning and a valid encrypted connection.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The site presents an app-based second-number service with rates and links to its listings on major app stores. Its long-standing domain and clean current browser-security and connection checks are reassuring, but one customer complaint describes an unsuccessful number renewal, an unexpected KYC requirement, expiration of the number, and rude support. That mixed record supports a Moderate Risk score rather than a scam classification.
Service offering and customer complaint
Call.com describes its product as “Your Second Number in an App,” provides a rates page and directs visitors to App Store and Google Play listings.
A customer complaint says the user bought a number but could not renew it despite repeated attempts; the number then expired, and the user says a KYC requirement emerged and support was rude. This is meaningful evidence of possible service and support problems, but it is one complaint and does not establish a systematic scam.
The captured page did not expose a direct contact email, which may make it less straightforward to identify a support channel from that page alone.
Current technical checks are clean, while older detections remain uncertain
The current evidence shows no browser threat warning and a valid encrypted connection. These checks reduce immediate technical concern but do not assess service quality or dispute handling.
Saved historical data records two suspicious antivirus results, although that evidence is stale and does not establish that the current service distributes malware or is presently unsafe.
The domain has existed for more than 11,000 days. The site says the business previously operated under Callserve and later Vyke, and it identifies Rolf Larsen as CEO; these are statements on the site rather than independently verified corporate credentials.
Why the score is 68
One customer complaint on a public review site: "My Experience With Call.com has been horrible.. I cant Recommend to any User especially Africans. They stereotype a lot, rude customer support. Bought a number…". Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 92
detectionsSaved analysis from October 2, 2026 - stale
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 2
- Total
- 92
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerSuspicious | suspicious |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 92 engine results
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Unrated
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekercompromised websites. parked domain
- alphaMountain.aiBusiness/Economy
- BitDefendermisc
- Googletelecommunications
- Sophosinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Your Second Number in an App
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Your Second Number in an App
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
Phone Numbers in an App, for Personal or Business use
- Meta description
Get a second phone number with Call com for personal or business use. Stay connected with Travel eSIM for hassle free data while traveling.
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
- About page/about/Read
- Terms/terms/Read
- Contact page/contact/Read
- Pricing/pricing/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Phone Numbers in an App, for Personal or Business use
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Saas
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01One customer complaint on a public review site: "My Experience With Call.com has been horrible.. I cant Recommend to any User especially Africans. They stereotype a lot, rude customer support. Bought a number…"
- 022 antivirus results marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 03The domain has been registered for more than 11,000 days.
Web research findings
Independent findings for call.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Trustpilotopen
"My Experience With Call.com has been horrible.. I cant Recommend to any User especially Africans. They stereotype a lot, rude customer support. Bought a number then tried to renew countless times until the number expired, only to find out they required KYc."
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaincall.com
- Redirects tocall.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
- Referenceseu.accelerate.altis.cloud · googletagmanager.com
Domain Timeline
- Feb 12, 1995Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 31 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 16, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
- Links to 5 social profiles.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for call.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Analytics and ads
- Google Tag Manager
- Cloudflare Web Analytics
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://call.com/
- 2200https://call.com/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
2 antivirus results marked the URL as suspicious. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One customer complaint on a public review site: "My Experience With Call.com has been horrible.. I cant Recommend to any User especially Africans. They stereotype a lot, rude customer support. Bought a number…" · No direct contact email was found on the captured page.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 92 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 16, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 92 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 2, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 16, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is call.com a scam or is it safe?
Is call.com safe to use?
Has call.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is call.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the call.com domain?
Does call.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is call.com hosted?
How often is the call.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Call.com is an established calling service, but customer-service and renewal concerns warrant caution
The site presents an app-based second-number service with rates and links to its listings on major app stores. Its long-standing domain and clean current browser-security and connection checks are reassuring, but one customer complaint describes an unsuccessful number renewal, an unexpected KYC requirement, expiration of the number, and rude support. That mixed record supports a Moderate Risk score rather than a scam classification.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of call.com?Verify and reply