Is clarascrubs.com safe?

Three separate buyers describe the same failed order

One reviewer calls the operation a scam outright, describing thin, cheap material, colours and sizes that did not match, and product photos allegedly taken from another scrubs company for advertising. The same account says the shop asked the buyer to send photos of herself wearing the garments so staff could decide whether they liked the fit — an unusual demand that has nothing to do with a normal return or sizing process.

A second buyer paid for four pairs of scrubs through PayPal and then received no shipping update. When they chased the order, the tracking link they were given led to a blank page reading that the shop was closed; a replacement link claimed the item was delivered when it was not.

A third buyer arrived from an advertisement, paid, and after fourteen days had no package. The tracking link was inactive, there was no phone number to call, and emails went unanswered. That account is filed on the BBB Scam Tracker.

The captured page itself lists no phone number, which matches the complaint that there is no working line to call.

Who runs the store, and what a visitor actually goes through

The site's own pages name JOSHINE INC. at 111 Dart Cir, Rome, NY 13441, United States. That is what the storefront claims about itself; it is not a verified registration, and a printed company name and address is not by itself a sign of legitimacy.

The commercial path is a conventional same-site funnel: an Order Track page, a Checkout page, a Payment Method page and an email capture field, plus Group Order and Order Tracking links. Nothing in that flow leaves the domain, so the risk is not a cross-domain redirect — it is what happens after the card or PayPal payment clears.

A screenshot of the site also shows a 'SPIN TO WIN A DISCOUNT' pop-up asking for an email address to spin a wheel. That is a marketing capture device, not evidence of fraud on its own, but it is the same email channel that complainants say goes unanswered.

Clean connection, dirty commercial record

The saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection and the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, so there is no evidence of a technical attack on the connection itself. The domain is also 854 days old, which is old enough that age alone tells us nothing either way.

One saved antivirus result, from Gridinsoft, marked the URL as suspicious. That observation is stale and comes from a saved record rather than a fresh submission, so it should be treated as a flag to confirm rather than a current verdict — but it is not a clean bill of health either.

The decisive evidence is operator-side, not technical: three independent customer accounts of payment taken without delivery, tracking links that are inactive or false, and support that does not respond. That pattern is what a fake storefront looks like after the sale, and it is why the score sits in the High Risk band despite the clean transport checks.