Is demon.com safe?
http://demon.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 4 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · not available: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Demon.com is an old, currently unreachable domain with a stale antivirus flag and no readable content
Demon.com is a domain registered in 1993, historically tied to a UK business broadband provider, but the site itself could not be reached during this scan. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and there is no established current reputation, it cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk. A saved antivirus observation also records an adverse result from one engine, though that data is stale and its timing relative to the current site is unclear. The score reflects an unverifiable, non-functional site with a lingering security flag rather than any confirmed active scam.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 55/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 1 finding pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe registrable domain is over 12,000 days old, with registration records dating to 1993, which is atypical for modern malicious infrastructure.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning for this domain.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Demon.com is a domain registered in 1993, historically tied to a UK business broadband provider, but the site itself could not be reached during this scan. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and there is no established current reputation, it cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk. A saved antivirus observation also records an adverse result from one engine, though that data is stale and its timing relative to the current site is unclear. The score reflects an unverifiable, non-functional site with a lingering security flag rather than any confirmed active scam.
Technical checks are mixed and the operator's current activity is unverified
A saved antivirus observation records one independent antivirus family reporting an adverse result for this domain. That observation is marked stale, so it should be treated as a real but dated detection whose timing relative to the current site is uncertain. The browser threat feed returned no threat warning, which is a supportive signal but does not clear the domain on its own.
The saved TLS check did not validate the connection, and the scanned address was served over plain HTTP. Combined with the fact that the page content could not be read at all, there is no way to inspect what the site currently serves, who operates it, or what a visitor would encounter.
A long domain history does not guarantee current safety
The registrable domain is over 12,000 days old, with registration records dating to May 1993. Independent research describes the domain in the context of a UK business broadband provider offering speeds up to 19 Mbps and 24/7 support. That history is atypical for modern malicious infrastructure and is a supportive context signal, but it does not establish what the domain currently hosts.
Because the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was not reviewed, the operator's current identity and intent remain unverified. The combination of an unreadable site, a stale adverse antivirus record, and no current reputation evidence places this domain in the Moderate Risk band rather than Safe or Low Risk.
Why the score is 55
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
2/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 28, 2026 - stale
2 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 2
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| ADMINUSLabsMalicious | malicious |
| ESETMalicious | phishing |
All 93 engine results
- ADMINUSLabs - Malicious
- ESET - phishing - Malicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- alphaMountain.aiBusiness/Economy, Information Technology
- BitDefenderbusiness
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for demon.com because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
2 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for demon.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- DomainsKitopen
"Created 1993-05-21 04:00:00 UTC"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaindemon.com
- Redirects todemon.com
- Hosted byNTT Global Data Centers EMEA UK Ltd.
Domain Timeline
- May 21, 1993Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 33 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 29, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidenceunavailable
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
unknownComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 2 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 28, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The saved page capture was not reliable enough to use | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Independent research | 2 independent findings were saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result2 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 28, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe saved page capture was not reliable enough to use
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Independent research
- Result2 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is demon.com a scam or is it safe?
Is demon.com safe to use?
Has demon.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is demon.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the demon.com domain?
Does demon.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is demon.com hosted?
How often is the demon.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Demon.com is an old, currently unreachable domain with a stale antivirus flag and no readable content
The written conclusion remains part of the saved report.
Demon.com is a domain registered in 1993, historically tied to a UK business broadband provider, but the site itself could not be reached during this scan. Because the site's own pages could not be reviewed and there is no established current reputation, it cannot be rated Safe or Low Risk. A saved antivirus observation also records an adverse result from one engine, though that data is stale and its timing relative to the current site is unclear. The score reflects an unverifiable, non-functional site with a lingering security flag rather than any confirmed active scam.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of demon.com?Verify and reply