Is scatkings.com safe?
http://scatkings.com/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: partial · 4 of 6 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (60 of 93 engines answered) · saved result: did not fully complete
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · not available: did not fully complete
- page capture · limited: did not fully complete
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Adult-content domain now returns a 404, with a stale antivirus flag and no readable pages to review
scatkings.com is a long-registered domain (registered 2014-01-14) that currently serves a 404 Not Found page, so its own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed. Independent research identified possible adult content and one security vendor has flagged it as potentially malicious, while the browser threat feed reports no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. Because the site's own pages were never reviewed and the adverse signals are moderate and partly stale, this is a Moderate Risk rating rather than a Safe one.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 62/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 2 findings pulled the score down; 3 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- Strong1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.-2 pts
- ModerateOne public warning in public web research: "Gridinsoft has flagged this website as potentially malicious"-1 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsThe registrable domain is 4,671 days old, with a WHOIS record showing registration on 2014-01-14.
- SupportsThe browser threat feed returned no threat warning.
- SupportsThe saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection.
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 65 to 62 and split those 3 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
scatkings.com is a long-registered domain (registered 2014-01-14) that currently serves a 404 Not Found page, so its own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed. Independent research identified possible adult content and one security vendor has flagged it as potentially malicious, while the browser threat feed reports no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. Because the site's own pages were never reviewed and the adverse signals are moderate and partly stale, this is a Moderate Risk rating rather than a Safe one.
What the evidence actually shows
The domain is not new: the registrable domain is 4,671 days old and a WHOIS record shows it was registered on 2014-01-14. That long history is a supportive signal, but it does not tell us who operates the site today or what it currently serves.
When the scan ran, the site returned HTTP 404 Not Found, so the site's own page, contact, About and policy text was not reviewed. A 404 means there is no storefront, checkout, or policy page to inspect at this address right now.
Independent research identified possible adult content on the domain, and a security-vendor listing describes Gridinsoft as having flagged the website as potentially malicious. A separate saved antivirus observation records one independent antivirus family reporting an adverse result, but that observation is stale and should be confirmed for timing.
Technical checks are clean, but operator risk is unverified
On the technical side, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. Those are real, current, supportive facts, but they only mean no detections were recorded at scan time; they do not establish that the operator is trustworthy.
On the operator side, the picture is thin. The site's own pages could not be reviewed because of the 404, so there is no readable About, contact, or policy text to confirm who runs the site or what it offers. The adverse signals are a possible-adult-content identification and a stale antivirus flag, which are moderate rather than decisive.
Why the score is 62
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
3/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 23, 2026 - stale
3 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 1
- Suspicious
- 2
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerSuspicious | spam |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | not recommended |
All 93 engine results
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - spam - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - not recommended - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerweb and email spam. sex
- alphaMountain.aiPornography
- BitDefenderporn
- Dr.Webadult content
- Sophossexually explicit
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
404 Not Found
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
404 Not Found
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Independent evidence classifies the site as content, but the page's own claim could not be captured.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
3 external findings were saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 6 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01The site returned HTTP 404 Not Found, so its own page, contact, About and policy text was not reviewed.
- 021 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 03The registrable domain is 4,671 days old, with a WHOIS record showing registration on 2014-01-14.
Web research findings
Independent findings for scatkings.com, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- ScamAdviseropen
"Gridinsoft has flagged this website as potentially malicious"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainscatkings.com
- Redirects toscatkings.com
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- Jan 14, 2014Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 12 years old when this review was saved.
- Oct 29, 2026Saved security review — Rated Moderate Risk
The evidence in this saved scan is mixed or incomplete; the completed checks are detailed above.
Domain & Encryption
Cloudflare DNS is used by legitimate and scam sites alike, so it does not identify who runs the site.
Certificate issued for scatkings.com.
A shared Cloudflare address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Redirect Chain
- 1301http://scatkings.com/
- 2404https://scatkings.com/
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentunavailable
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencepartial
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
1 independent antivirus family reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning in public web research: "Gridinsoft has flagged this website as potentially malicious"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 3 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 23, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Unavailable | No saved finding | Not available |
| Visual evidence | The site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
| Independent research | 3 independent findings were saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 29, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result3 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimitedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 23, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionUnavailableFindingNo saved finding
- FreshnessNot available
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
- Independent research
- Result3 independent findings were saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 29, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is scatkings.com a scam or is it safe?
Is scatkings.com safe to use?
Has scatkings.com been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is scatkings.com on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the scatkings.com domain?
Does scatkings.com have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is scatkings.com hosted?
How often is the scatkings.com report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Adult-content domain now returns a 404, with a stale antivirus flag and no readable pages to review
scatkings.com is a long-registered domain (registered 2014-01-14) that currently serves a 404 Not Found page, so its own page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed. Independent research identified possible adult content and one security vendor has flagged it as potentially malicious, while the browser threat feed reports no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. Because the site's own pages were never reviewed and the adverse signals are moderate and partly stale, this is a Moderate Risk rating rather than a Safe one.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of scatkings.com?Verify and reply