Is governance-token.works safe?
http://governance-token.works/
Coveragepartial2 of 4 applicable core capabilities
Unreadable crypto-themed domain carries multiple independent phishing detections
governance-token.works is a young domain that returns an HTTP 409 error, so its own pages, contact details, About and policy text were never reviewed. Multiple independent antivirus families flag it as malicious with a phishing classification, and a the multi-engine malware scan-based scan record shows 17 malicious detections. A phishing detection means an attacker-controlled page is likely harvesting credentials or similar sensitive input; because the site itself cannot be loaded, visitors cannot see what — if anything — is being served today. The browser threat feed currently returns no warning and the TLS connection check is clean, so no content has been confirmed by our own observation; safety therefore hinges entirely on the vendor detections and the absence of any usable site content.
Be the first to review governance-token.works
Lost money to governance-token.works? Warn others
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
governance-token.works is a young domain that returns an HTTP 409 error, so its own pages, contact details, About and policy text were never reviewed. Multiple independent antivirus families flag it as malicious with a phishing classification, and a the multi-engine malware scan-based scan record shows 17 malicious detections. A phishing detection means an attacker-controlled page is likely harvesting credentials or similar sensitive input; because the site itself cannot be loaded, visitors cannot see what — if anything — is being served today. The browser threat feed currently returns no warning and the TLS connection check is clean, so no content has been confirmed by our own observation; safety therefore hinges entirely on the vendor detections and the absence of any usable site content.
Vendor detections point to phishing
A saved antivirus observation records eight independent antivirus families returning an adverse result, naming BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao and Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, and describes the flagged activity specifically as phishing. This is a saved observation rather than a live re-submission, so the detection is real but its exact timing is unclear.
Independent web research surfaced a scan record for this domain reporting 17 malicious detections. Combined with the antivirus aggregation, this is consistent, repeated adverse third-party verdicts against the host rather than a single outlier.
The site itself cannot be inspected
The page content could not be read because the server responded with HTTP 409. No page, contact, About or policy text was reviewed, so we cannot confirm what the site currently shows, who operates it, or what it asks visitors to do.
The registrable domain is only 150 days old, and there is no accessible site copy to offset the phishing detections with legitimate content. The hosting IP has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports, which is neutral context only and does not clear the domain.
A visual observation recorded only the page text 'Check domain settings governance-token.works', which is consistent with the HTTP 409 error and shows no usable site content was presented.
Clean technical checks do not clear the domain
The browser threat feed returned no threat warning and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. These outcomes mean only that no threat was recorded by those particular checks at that time; a valid certificate secures transit but says nothing about the intent of whoever runs the domain.
Because the site body is unreadable, no operator identity, ownership record or legitimate business activity could be verified against the strong adverse antivirus findings.
Why the score is 15
8 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
13/ 93
detectionsSaved analysis from October 9, 2026 - stale
13 engines flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 9
- Suspicious
- 4
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| BitDefenderMalicious | phishing |
| Chong Lua DaoMalicious | malicious |
| Forcepoint ThreatSeekerMalicious | phishing |
| G-DataMalicious | phishing |
| KasperskyMalicious | phishing |
| LionicMalicious | phishing |
| RisingMalicious | phishing |
| SophosMalicious | phishing |
| VIPREMalicious | phishing |
| alphaMountain.aiSuspicious | spam |
| ESETSuspicious | suspicious |
| FortinetSuspicious | spam |
| GridinsoftSuspicious | suspicious |
All 93 engine results
- BitDefender - phishing - Malicious
- Chong Lua Dao - Malicious
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - phishing - Malicious
- G-Data - phishing - Malicious
- Kaspersky - phishing - Malicious
- Lionic - phishing - Malicious
- Rising - phishing - Malicious
- Sophos - phishing - Malicious
- VIPRE - phishing - Malicious
- alphaMountain.ai - spam - Suspicious
- ESET - Suspicious
- Fortinet - spam - Suspicious
- Gridinsoft - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Clean
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Check domain settings
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Check domain settings
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
No page claim could be verified for governance-token.works because no usable page content or saved capture was available.
What we observed
The page itself could not be fully inspected, so the report relies on the other saved checks.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
2 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
Phishing & Impersonation
Service and business model
Unknown
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 018 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing.
- 02One public warning on a public review site: "VirusTotal malicious detections-17 1 malicious detections"
- 03The registrable domain is 150 days old.
Web research findings
Independent findings for governance-token.works, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
- Malware Guideopen
"VirusTotal malicious detections-17 1 malicious detections"
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domaingovernance-token.works
- Redirects togovernance-token.works
- Hosted byCloudflare, Inc.
Domain Timeline
- May 22, 2026Domain registered
First appeared in WHOIS records — 5 months old when this review was saved.
- Oct 19, 2026Saved security review — Rated Dangerous
The completed checks from this saved scan are detailed above.
governance-token.works was registered very recently when this review was saved and was already flagged. Freshly-registered domains are disproportionately used for scams, and a young domain with active threat signals warrants extra caution.
Domain & Encryption
Server Reputation
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruspartial
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencepartial
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
8 independent antivirus families reported an adverse result. This comes from a saved antivirus observation rather than a new submission, so treat the detection as real but confirm the timing. · The site returned HTTP 409 and its page, contact, About and policy text could not be reviewed.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
One public warning on a public review site: "VirusTotal malicious detections-17 1 malicious detections"
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 13 of 93 engines flagged | Limited | Adverse | stale fallback · analysed Oct 9, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Page content | Page content was not available for semantic review | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | The site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | Adverse | this scan · Oct 19, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result13 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionLimited
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessstale fallback · analysed Oct 9, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage content was not available for semantic review
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Visual evidence
- ResultThe site blocked our capture or showed an error page; 1 visible observation saved
- CompletionLimited
- FindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompleted
- FindingAdverse
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 19, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is governance-token.works a scam or a legit website?
Is governance-token.works safe to use?
What should I do if I already gave my details to governance-token.works?
Can I get my money back from governance-token.works?
Did governance-token.works steal my password or personal information?
How do I report governance-token.works?
Why does governance-token.works look legitimate if it's a scam?
Has governance-token.works been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is governance-token.works on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the governance-token.works domain?
Where is governance-token.works hosted?
How often is the governance-token.works report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Unreadable crypto-themed domain carries multiple independent phishing detections
governance-token.works is a young domain that returns an HTTP 409 error, so its own pages, contact details, About and policy text were never reviewed. Multiple independent antivirus families flag it as malicious with a phishing classification, and a the multi-engine malware scan-based scan record shows 17 malicious detections. A phishing detection means an attacker-controlled page is likely harvesting credentials or similar sensitive input; because the site itself cannot be loaded, visitors cannot see what — if anything — is being served today. The browser threat feed currently returns no warning and the TLS connection check is clean, so no content has been confirmed by our own observation; safety therefore hinges entirely on the vendor detections and the absence of any usable site content.
09 · Community