Is kingpedia-93.vercel.app safe?
http://kingpedia-93.vercel.app/
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: complete · 4 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (59 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading: completed
- page capture: completed
- domain records: completed
- web research: completed
Kingpedia is a static open-data search interface with no malicious detections, but it hides its operator and its "Premium" label has no visible payment path.
Kingpedia (kingpedia-93.vercel.app) presents itself as a single search box for Earth-related profiles assembled live from Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and OpenStreetMap, and it states that nothing is invented and that facts missing from open sources are flagged as such. It also claims no accounts, no trackers and no analytics, with searches and saved subjects staying on the device. Technical checks are clean: no malicious or suspicious detections across 93 engines, no browser threat feed warning, and a valid encrypted connection. The concerns are operator-side rather than technical. No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so there is no disclosed owner, company or support channel, and the footer carries a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page. That combination — a clean but anonymous static tool with an unexplained paid tier — keeps this out of the Safe band but does not support any scam classification.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 78/100
Low Risk covers scores 70–84. 2 findings pulled the score down; 2 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- ModerateThe footer shows a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page.
- MinorNo direct contact email was found on the captured page, so no owner, company or support channel is disclosed.
What pushed the score up
- SupportsNo malicious or suspicious detections across 93 engines, no the browser threat feed warning, and a valid encrypted connection.
- SupportsThe site describes itself as a search interface over credited open sources (Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, OpenStreetMap) with nothing generated.
No points per finding are stored for this report: our analysis weighed all findings together to set the score. Each finding shows its saved severity instead (Decisive, Strong, Moderate or Minor). Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
Kingpedia (kingpedia-93.vercel.app) presents itself as a single search box for Earth-related profiles assembled live from Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and OpenStreetMap, and it states that nothing is invented and that facts missing from open sources are flagged as such. It also claims no accounts, no trackers and no analytics, with searches and saved subjects staying on the device. Technical checks are clean: no malicious or suspicious detections across 93 engines, no browser threat feed warning, and a valid encrypted connection. The concerns are operator-side rather than technical. No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so there is no disclosed owner, company or support channel, and the footer carries a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page. That combination — a clean but anonymous static tool with an unexplained paid tier — keeps this out of the Safe band but does not support any scam classification.
A read-only open-data search tool, not a store or a financial service
The captured page describes Kingpedia as a search interface that assembles profiles live from Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and OpenStreetMap, with all sources credited and nothing generated. A second block repeats that every profile is assembled live from those same open sources and that if a fact is not recorded in an open source, Kingpedia says so. The visible page text is consistent with a static front-end that queries public datasets rather than a shop, casino, wallet or download portal.
The site also states that it has no account, no tracker and no analytics, and that searches and saved subjects stay on the device. That is the site's own claim about its data handling, not an independently verified audit, but it is consistent with the absence of any login, checkout or wallet-connect flow in the captured evidence.
Clean technical checks, but no disclosed operator and an unexplained "Premium" label
The technical layer is clean. The saved scan returned 0 malicious and 0 suspicious detections across 93 engines, the browser threat feed returned no threat warning, and the saved TLS check found a valid encrypted connection. These results mean no known threat was detected at scan time; they do not vouch for the operator behind the page.
The operator layer is weaker. No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so there is no disclosed owner, company or support route to hold accountable if something goes wrong. The footer shows "Kingpedia Version 9.0 · Premium", yet no payment mechanism or subscription detail is visible on the captured page, leaving the paid tier unexplained. A registration record for a similarly named domain (kingpedia.net, registrar MIDWESTDOMAINS, LLC) appears in research, but it is a different domain and does not identify who runs this Vercel-hosted site.
Why the score is 78
The saved checks found no material threat, but the evidence was not strong enough for the highest Safe tier. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
0/ 93
No detectionsFresh result
No detections across 59 engines that rated this URL
No antivirus engine that answered raised an adverse result; 34 had no rating for this URL. This is one signal, not a guarantee.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 0
- Total
- 93
All 93 engine results
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Clean
- Chong Lua Dao - Clean
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Clean
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- Sophos - Clean
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerinformation technology
- Sophosinformation technology
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Kingpedia ONE SEARCH FOR EARTH
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Kingpedia ONE SEARCH FOR EARTH
What the page says about itself
What the site says about itself, quoted from the pages we read. The site wrote these words; they are not our findings.
- Page title
Kingpedia — One Search for Everything on Earth
- Meta description
Kingpedia — search plants, animals, monuments, rivers, oceans, historic places and famous people. Photos, deep facts, charts, timelines, maps, study tools and encyclopedia insights from Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and OpenStreetMap.
Pages we read
- Main page/Read
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
Kingpedia — One Search for Everything on Earth
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 59 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
The checks completed, but ownership, business claims, and future site behavior can still change after this snapshot.
What kind of site and risk is this?
Threat category
No threat category confirmed
Service and business model
Content
Observed behavior
Evidence behind this classification
- 01No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so no owner, company or support channel is disclosed.
- 02No malicious or suspicious detections across 93 engines, no the browser threat feed warning, and a valid encrypted connection.
- 03The footer shows a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page.
Web research findings
Independent findings for kingpedia-93.vercel.app, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for kingpedia-93.vercel.app. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainkingpedia-93.vercel.app
- Redirects tokingpedia-93.vercel.app
- Hosted byVercel, Inc
- Referencesopenstreetmap.org
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
- No direct contact email found on the captured page.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for *.vercel.app.
A shared content-delivery network address answers for many sites, so it is not the site's own server and says nothing about who runs it.
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Redirect Chain
- 1308http://kingpedia-93.vercel.app/
- 2206https://kingpedia-93.vercel.app/
Server Reputation
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentcomplete
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
unknownMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
No confirmed evidence in this dimension.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
The footer shows a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page. · No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so no owner, company or support channel is disclosed.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 0 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | No adverse finding | fresh · analysed Oct 17, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 17, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result0 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 17, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 17, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is kingpedia-93.vercel.app a scam or is it safe?
Is kingpedia-93.vercel.app safe to use?
Has kingpedia-93.vercel.app been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is kingpedia-93.vercel.app on any phishing or malware blacklists?
How old is the kingpedia-93.vercel.app domain?
Does kingpedia-93.vercel.app have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is kingpedia-93.vercel.app hosted?
How often is the kingpedia-93.vercel.app report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Kingpedia is a static open-data search interface with no malicious detections, but it hides its operator and its "Premium" label has no visible payment path.
Kingpedia (kingpedia-93.vercel.app) presents itself as a single search box for Earth-related profiles assembled live from Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and OpenStreetMap, and it states that nothing is invented and that facts missing from open sources are flagged as such. It also claims no accounts, no trackers and no analytics, with searches and saved subjects staying on the device. Technical checks are clean: no malicious or suspicious detections across 93 engines, no browser threat feed warning, and a valid encrypted connection. The concerns are operator-side rather than technical. No direct contact email was found on the captured page, so there is no disclosed owner, company or support channel, and the footer carries a "Premium" label with no payment mechanism or subscription detail visible on the captured page. That combination — a clean but anonymous static tool with an unexplained paid tier — keeps this out of the Safe band but does not support any scam classification.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of kingpedia-93.vercel.app?Verify and reply