Is www.version.affectionatecelio.ru safe?
https://www.version.affectionatecelio.ru/2eS0EMhw__tGTBU46G8OTSWvKRepT1I4HxyT9e1aEBLJ3WDAA7uE6lgz_6IKygQRdanK0JbJ_VQR6E9p9mJKkQ==
Checked on
How we checked
Coverage: strong · 3 of 4 applicable core capabilities
- Antivirus (56 of 93 engines answered): completed
- Google Safe Browsing: completed
- page reading · limited: did not fully complete
- page capture: completed
- domain records · not available: did not fully complete
- web research: completed
Opaque continue page with one isolated security detection
The observed page exposes only a generic Continue/Next control, leaving its purpose and destination unclear. One of 93 antivirus engines flagged the URL, but there was no broader vendor consensus; clean Safe Browsing, TLS, and hosting-reputation checks reduce concern without establishing that the page or its operator is trustworthy.
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Where this site sits
- Dangerous1–20
- High Risk21–44
- Moderate Risk45–69
- Low Risk70–84
- Safe85–100
The score combines saved evidence strength and analysis quality. Coverage is reported separately.
Why 56/100
Moderate Risk covers scores 45–69. 2 findings pulled the score down; 1 pushed it up.
What pulled the score down
- ModerateOne of 93 antivirus engines detected the URL, without vendor consensus.-16 pts
- ModerateThe captured page offers only a generic Continue/Next action whose destination is not established by the evidence.-15 pts
What pushed the score up
- SupportsSafe Browsing showed no warning, TLS was valid, and the hosting IP had no saved abuse reports.
Points come from the saved evidence ledger: it lowered the score from 87 to 56 and split those 31 points between the findings that show points; the others carry no points in the ledger. Community reviews never change the Safety Score.
01 · Investigation Brief
Investigation Brief
The observed page exposes only a generic Continue/Next control, leaving its purpose and destination unclear. One of 93 antivirus engines flagged the URL, but there was no broader vendor consensus; clean Safe Browsing, TLS, and hosting-reputation checks reduce concern without establishing that the page or its operator is trustworthy.
The page does not explain the next step
The captured page presents a button labeled Continue, while the screenshot identifies it as Next. The supplied evidence does not reveal what happens after it is pressed.
The site's contact details were not reviewed because its page text was not read in full, so operator transparency cannot be assessed from this scan.
Mixed technical signals, with no confirmed malicious mechanism
One antivirus engine flagged the URL as suspicious, while the other 92 engines did not provide a matching detection. This isolated result warrants caution but does not identify phishing, malware, or another concrete harmful action.
Safe Browsing returned no threat warning, the TLS connection was valid, and the hosting IP had an abuse confidence score of 0/100 across zero saved reports. These checks show no detection in those sources, not that the unexplained landing page is safe to use.
Why the score is 56
One of 93 antivirus engines detected the URL, without vendor consensus. Coverage remains separate so missing sources cannot be mistaken for clean results.
02 · Security Evidence
Security evidence
Antivirus Engines
1/ 93
detectionsFresh result
1 engine flagged this URL
Every saved adverse engine is listed below. The full provider matrix remains available for audit.
- Malicious
- 0
- Suspicious
- 1
- Total
- 93
| Engine | Finding |
|---|---|
| SophosSuspicious | spam |
All 93 engine results
- Sophos - spam - Suspicious
- 0xSI_f33d - Unrated
- Abusix - Clean
- Acronis - Clean
- ADMINUSLabs - Clean
- AILabs (MONITORAPP) - Clean
- AlienVault - Clean
- alphaMountain.ai - Unrated
- AlphaSOC - Unrated
- Antiy-AVL - Clean
- ArcSight Threat Intelligence - Unrated
- AutoShun - Unrated
- Bfore.Ai PreCrime - Unrated
- BitDefender - Clean
- Bkav - Unrated
- BlockList - Clean
- Blueliv - Clean
- Certego - Clean
- ChainPatrol - Unrated
- Chong Lua Dao - Unrated
- CINS Army - Clean
- CRDF - Clean
- Criminal IP - Unrated
- CSIS Security Group - Unrated
- CTX AI - Clean
- Cyan - Unrated
- Cyble - Clean
- CyRadar - Clean
- desenmascara.me - Clean
- DNS8 - Unrated
- Dr.Web - Clean
- EmergingThreats - Clean
- Emsisoft - Clean
- Ermes - Unrated
- ESET - Clean
- ESTsecurity - Clean
- Forcepoint ThreatSeeker - Clean
- Fortinet - Clean
- Fortra - Unrated
- G-Data - Clean
- GCP Abuse Intelligence - Unrated
- Google Safe Browsing - Clean
- GreenSnow - Clean
- GreyNoise - Unrated
- Gridinsoft - Unrated
- Guardpot - Unrated
- Heimdal Security - Clean
- Hunt.io Intelligence - Unrated
- IPsum - Clean
- Juniper Networks - Clean
- K7AntiVirus - Unrated
- Kaspersky - Unrated
- LevelBlue - Clean
- Lionic - Clean
- Lumu - Unrated
- Malwared - Clean
- MalwarePatrol - Clean
- MalwareURL - Unrated
- Mimecast - Unrated
- Netcraft - Unrated
- OpenPhish - Clean
- Orcapot - Unrated
- PhishFort - Unrated
- Phishing Database - Clean
- Phishtank - Clean
- PREBYTES - Clean
- PrecisionSec - Unrated
- Quick Heal - Clean
- Quttera - Clean
- Rising - Clean
- SafeToOpen - Unrated
- Sangfor - Clean
- Sansec eComscan - Unrated
- Scantitan - Clean
- SCUMWARE.org - Clean
- Seclookup - Clean
- Snort IP sample list - Unrated
- SOCRadar - Unrated
- StopForumSpam - Clean
- Sucuri SiteCheck - Clean
- Synthient - Unrated
- ThreatHive - Clean
- URLhaus - Clean
- URLQuery - Unrated
- Viettel Threat Intelligence - Clean
- VIPRE - Unrated
- ViriBack - Clean
- VX Vault - Clean
- Webroot - Clean
- Xcitium Verdict Cloud - Clean
- Yandex Safebrowsing - Clean
- ZeroCERT - Clean
- ZeroFox - Unrated
How security vendors categorise this site
- Sophosspam urls
- Forcepoint ThreatSeekerdynamic content
Each vendor’s own label for the site, saved with the antivirus result. Labels are separate from the engine verdicts above and can disagree with each other.
Security Scans
Checked against the browser threat feeds available to this scan — no hit.
What we observed
Loading saved screenshot
Preparing the saved page preview.
Visual context from the captured page
Next
What the captured page showed
1 observation- 01
Next
03 · Investigation Story
Investigation story
What the site claims
The captured page did not expose a clear title or service claim.
What we observed
The page content was captured and checked alongside 56 antivirus results.
What independent research found
1 external finding was saved and compared with the page evidence.
What remains unverified
1 of the 4 applicable core capabilities did not complete, so those gaps remain visible in the coverage ledger.
Web research findings
Independent findings for www.version.affectionatecelio.ru, including public complaints, named review sources, registration records, and look-alike-domain evidence. A missing result is shown as unverified, never converted into a clean bill of health.
No independently sourced scam reports or credibility records were found for www.version.affectionatecelio.ru. That is common for new or low-traffic sites and does not clear the site.
Reputation Sources
How this domain rates across independent threat-intelligence and blocklist providers.
04 · Domain & Infrastructure
Domain & infrastructure
The plumbing behind the site — who registered it, how it’s encrypted, where it’s hosted, and where it links out. A valid certificate or a calm server doesn’t mean the business is honest — scam sites pass these checks too. Use this to corroborate the verdict, not to overturn it.
Infrastructure map
How the saved page connected to the wider web.
- Domainwww.version.affectionatecelio.ru
- Redirects towww.version.affectionatecelio.ru
- Hosted byBrainoza OU
- Referencescdnjs.cloudflare.com
Contact Verification
Saved contact details can help identify the operator. Their presence supports traceability; it does not prove the business is trustworthy.
Domain & Encryption
Certificate issued for www.version.affectionatecelio.ru.
Scripts, fonts and CDNs
- cdnjs
Payment providers the page loads
None seen among the outside domains we saved.
Read from the first 20 outside domains the page loads and the shop platform it uses; the web server and platform rows are under Hosting & Technology. A payment script on the page does not prove the shop accepts that method at checkout, or that you are protected.
Server Reputation
Sites linked to this one
Other sites we have reports for that share something checkable with this one. A shared detail is a lead to compare, not proof that the sites have the same owner or the same risk; each keeps its own rating.
On the same server IP
Also served from 185.36.143.175 (Brainoza OU). Unrelated sites can share a server, so this is a lead, not proof.
- www.vault.calmtogether.bizHigh Risk
- www.qa.foreverdeck.bizModerate Risk
- www.stage.neartogether.bizHigh Risk
- www.checkout.nextforever.bizModerate Risk
- www.rewards.promisespot.bizModerate Risk
- www.credit.promisegarden.bizModerate Risk
- www.ai.realvenus.bizModerate Risk
- www.wallet.alishafriendly.ruHigh Risk
and 4 more reports in this group
Referenced Domains
Outbound domains this page links to or loads resources from. Each links to its own security scan.
05 · Evidence Ledger
Evidence ledger
- Antiviruscomplete
- Browser threat feedcomplete
- Page contentpartial
- Analysiscomplete
- Visual evidencecomplete
The conclusion is supported by the evidence saved with this report.
Technical threat
suspiciousMalware, phishing, credential theft and hostile infrastructure.
One of 93 antivirus engines detected the URL, without vendor consensus.
Operator / customer risk
suspiciousComplaints, withdrawals, business conduct and commercial traps.
The captured page offers only a generic Continue/Next action whose destination is not established by the evidence.
Source coverage and freshness
Status shows whether usable evidence was saved; finding shows what that evidence observed.
| Source | Result | Completion | Finding | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antivirus | 1 of 93 engines flagged | Completed | Adverse | fresh · analysed Oct 11, 2026 |
| Browser protection | No browser threat-list match | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 11, 2026 |
| Page content | Page fetched · HTTP 200 | Limited | No saved finding | this scan · Oct 11, 2026 |
| Visual evidence | 1 visible observation saved with the page capture | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 11, 2026 |
| Independent research | 1 independent finding was saved | Completed | No adverse finding | this scan · Oct 11, 2026 |
- Antivirus
- Result1 of 93 engines flagged
- CompletionCompletedFindingAdverse
- Freshnessfresh · analysed Oct 11, 2026
- Browser protection
- ResultNo browser threat-list match
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 11, 2026
- Page content
- ResultPage fetched · HTTP 200
- CompletionLimitedFindingNo saved finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 11, 2026
- Visual evidence
- Result1 visible observation saved with the page capture
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 11, 2026
- Independent research
- Result1 independent finding was saved
- CompletionCompletedFindingNo adverse finding
- Freshnessthis scan · Oct 11, 2026
07 · Safety FAQ
Safety FAQ
Common questions, answered directly from the scan data above — so the answers reflect the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is www.version.affectionatecelio.ru a scam or is it safe?
Is www.version.affectionatecelio.ru safe to use?
Has www.version.affectionatecelio.ru been flagged by antivirus engines?
Is www.version.affectionatecelio.ru on any phishing or malware blacklists?
Does www.version.affectionatecelio.ru have a valid SSL certificate?
Where is www.version.affectionatecelio.ru hosted?
How often is the www.version.affectionatecelio.ru report updated?
08 · Final Verdict
Final verdict
Opaque continue page with one isolated security detection
The observed page exposes only a generic Continue/Next control, leaving its purpose and destination unclear. One of 93 antivirus engines flagged the URL, but there was no broader vendor consensus; clean Safe Browsing, TLS, and hosting-reputation checks reduce concern without establishing that the page or its operator is trustworthy.
09 · Community
Community
Are you the owner of www.version.affectionatecelio.ru?Verify and reply
More reports in this category
Recent Moderate Risk reports are prioritized by broad site category when that data is available. This is not a fingerprint match and does not imply identical risk.
This automated risk assessment reflects the evidence available at scan time. It is informational, not legal advice. Always use your own judgement before sharing personal information or money online.