File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is SETUP_ lNSTALLER_ (KEY. 6556). zip safe? Yes, no threats found.
Only 1 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP with a generic archive label, while higher-confidence engines provided no supporting detection.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
1 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 61
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen Today
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The lone detection is a generic ZIP warning from McAfeeD, with no supporting detection among the higher-confidence engines. This most likely represents a false positive, although the archive was first seen on Nov 6, 2026 and its contents were not examined, so keep protection enabled when handling it.
Only 1 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the ZIP, and that detection came from a less reliable engine using a generic suspicious-archive label. None of the 18 higher-confidence engines flagged it, and no actual malware family was identified. Public malware databases and malware-specific community rules did not corroborate the detection. However, the file was submitted by only one source and first seen on Nov 6, 2026, so it lacks an established reputation. No completed observation from the test run or examination of the archive contents is available, which limits certainty about anything enclosed in the ZIP.
What We Detected
Only 1 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP. McAfeeD applied a generic suspicious-archive label, while the 18 higher-confidence engines did not flag it and no real malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
No completed observation from the test run is available, and the archive contents were not examined by our static analysis. Therefore, there is no observed execution behavior to assess and no complete host-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
The detection pattern most likely reflects a false positive. Because the archive was submitted by only one source and first seen on Nov 6, 2026, obtain it from the expected source, keep security software enabled, and scan extracted files before opening or running them.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The archive was submitted by only one source and first seen on Nov 6, 2026, so its history is too limited to provide a strong benign reputation.
- The archive contents were not examined, meaning a harmful enclosed file could remain undetected despite the weak antivirus result.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the ZIP.
- None of the 18 higher-confidence engines flagged it.
- No public malware-database entry or malware-specific community rule corroborated the detection.
- No malware family consensus was present.
- The ZIP was first seen on Nov 6, 2026 and has been submitted by only one source, so it has little reputation history.
- The archive contents were not examined, and no completed observation from the test run is available.
- McAfeeD applied a generic suspicious-archive detection.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
1 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flags it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- McAfeeDTrojan:Archive/SuspicousZIP.DXP!1
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 6, 2026, 5:22 AM UTC
- SHA-256
698fdc87488c12c969d9ce9491e0ba2681cc92c4a0134e6c65d89c3253b5186b- SHA-1
f2d364cf7903a903655d32216862e9d059de7308- MD5
96725081912bba9c21d6af43e49e941f
About this file
SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip is a ZIP file of 598.4 kB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 598.4 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Nov 6, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip safe?
What is SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip?
How many antivirus engines detected SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip?
Is it safe to open or extract SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip?
How up to date is this analysis of SETUP_lNSTALLER_(KEY.6556).zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.