File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Bedrock
No antivirus engine detected a threat, and evidence from the test run showed no corroborated high-risk activity, malicious host, or malicious dropped file.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 69 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 69
- No result 6
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 10d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including the major engines represented in the results. Evidence from the test run contained only unsupported technique mappings, while the complete host-reputation check found no malicious or suspicious host; however, the file is unsigned and lacks direct static inspection.
None of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and 18 major engines reported no detection. The sandbox runs did not produce a malicious verdict, named injection target, persistence indicator, or corroborated high-risk technique. The observed network contacts were fully covered by the saved reputation check, which found no malicious or suspicious host. The executable is also not packed, and no malicious file it created or malware-specific community rule was identified. Confidence is moderated because it is unsigned, has modest prevalence, and the bytes were not available for our static analysis.
What We Detected
None of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including 18 major engines that reported no detection. No malware family was identified, no packing was found, and the external reference checks produced no malware-specific match.
Threat Behavior
The sandbox runs recorded activity commonly seen in ordinary applications. The complete reputation check covering the two distinct observed hosts found neither a malicious nor suspicious host, and no malicious dropped file was identified.
What To Do Now
The available evidence supports normal use if the file came from the source you intended. Because the executable is unsigned and our static analysis was unavailable, keep security software enabled and obtain it from the publisher's established distribution channel.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The executable is unsigned and was first seen on Oct 27, 2026, with only 18 distinct submitters, so its publisher and long-term history are not established.
- No completed static analysis of the uploaded bytes is available, limiting direct inspection of the executable's contents.
- A prior file with the same import-table fingerprint received a malicious decision, although that weak match had no matching signer and can occur across unrelated software.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and 18 major engines reported no detection.
- The sandbox runs produced no malicious verdict and named no process targeted for injection.
- The complete reputation check covering the two distinct observed hosts found no malicious or suspicious host.
- No malicious dropped file, packer, or malware-specific community rule was identified.
- The executable has no verified publisher signature.
- It was first seen on Oct 27, 2026, and has been submitted by 18 distinct sources, providing only a modest history.
- Direct static inspection of the uploaded bytes was not available.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 5 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 5isolated sandbox runs
- 21sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 2network contacts
- 32filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 21 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 69 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 6, 2026, 2:41 PM UTC
- SHA-256
c9110025450915feabcbabdbc40e80df4ee9ee8c2cda18105d662bc29ee10685- SHA-1
2333fe135bafc29bf479f3acad3c08fed4f3df42- MD5
b5bda42663282aa1ebcd5a66abb7c2d2
About this file
BedrockToolchest.dll is a Win32 EXE file of 66.8 MB.
- Claims to be
- BedrockToolchest (Bedrock Toolchest)From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Original name
- BedrockToolchest.dllMatches the shared file name.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 66.8 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 27, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 18 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.33 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is BedrockToolchest.dll safe?
What is BedrockToolchest.dll?
How many antivirus engines detected BedrockToolchest.dll?
What is the SHA-256 hash of BedrockToolchest.dll?
Is it safe to run BedrockToolchest.dll?
How up to date is this analysis of BedrockToolchest.dll?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.