File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is GTA6_ LUCIA_ NACKED. mp4. rar safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
Seven of the 64 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, including ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky, while sandbox evidence shows it launching an executable disguised as an…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already opened or extracted it, follow the steps below.
What to do now3 steps
This RAR archive is harmful. Don't open or extract it, and delete it.
If you haven't opened or extracted it
Don't open or extract this archive. Delete the archive and any files you extracted from it, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened or extracted it
If you already extracted it, delete the extracted files too and run a full antivirus scan.
If a page it opened asked for a password or card details and you entered them, change that password and call your bank.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
7 of 64 flagged
- Flagged 7
- No detection 57
- No result 11
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 14d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The run also mapped possible process injection and defense impairment, making the archive unsuitable to open despite the sandbox's clean summary.
The archive presents itself as MP4-related content but extracts and runs a file ending in .mp4.exe. Seven of the 64 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including two independent major antivirus engines that identified generic or packed-trojan characteristics. Evidence from the test run mapped and T1562.001, although no specific injection target was recorded. The observed domain and IP were fully checked against the available host cache without a malicious or suspicious match, and the sandbox summary was clean. Those counter-signals reduce certainty about the exact family, but they do not outweigh the executable masquerade, offensive behavior, newness, and corroborating detections.
What We Detected
The RAR uses a media-themed name but contains and launches GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.exe. Seven of the 64 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive. ESET-NOD32 identified Kryptik characteristics, Kaspersky reported a generic trojan, and several other independent engines also raised malicious detections.
Threat Behavior
The completed sandbox run mapped T1055, possible process injection, and T1562.001, possible impairment of defenses. No target process was identified for the injection mapping, so its exact mechanism remains unconfirmed. The sample contacted one dynamic-DNS domain and one IP address; both observed hosts were covered by the reputation check and neither had a cached malicious or suspicious classification.
What To Do Now
Do not extract or execute the archive. Delete or quarantine it while keeping security software enabled. If it was already opened, disconnect the affected system from sensitive accounts and networks, run a full security scan, and review recent account activity.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The completed sandbox run returned a clean verdict, although it still recorded executable masquerading and offensive-technique mappings.
- Fifteen major antivirus engines did not flag the file, and the two detecting major antivirus engines did not agree on a specific family.
- The host-reputation check covered both observed contacts and found neither in the cached malicious or suspicious lists.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The completed sandbox run produced a clean summary verdict.
- Fifteen major antivirus engines did not flag the archive.
- Both observed network hosts were covered by the reputation check and had no cached malicious or suspicious classification.
- The archive disguises an executable as an MP4-related file using a double extension.
- Seven antivirus engines raised detections, including ESET-NOD32 and Kaspersky.
- Sandbox data mapped possible process injection and impairment of defenses.
- The file is and has only one recorded submission.
- The sample contacted a dynamic-DNS domain during execution.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 12sandbox rule tags
- 6spawned processes
- 2network contacts
- 13filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 7: FileSeen in the test run
GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar
6e3635e2809d690fb77360fb80ab079b9439f845486dc8273095c0bd95528774
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4/GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 7: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\RarSFX0\stub.bat" "
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_50078
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\RarSFX0\__tmp_rar_sfx_access_check_50078
Test run - Evidence 5 of 7: Written fileSeen in the test run
stub.bat
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\RarSFX0\stub.bat
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
duckyduckserver.duckdns.org
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - Evidence 7 of 7: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
88.166.139.89
Contacted during the test run.
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
7 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 12 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 5 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
7 of the 64 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 7
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Win64/Kryptik.HCL trojan
- Kaspersky (major engine)HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Generic
- BkavW32.Malware.84DFBEEB
- ClamAVLegacy.Trojan.Agent-1388784
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
- McAfeeDTrojan:Win/SuspiciousZip.VIA
- XcitiumHeur.Dual.Extensions@1z141z3
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 11, 2026, 5:25 PM UTC
- SHA-256
6e3635e2809d690fb77360fb80ab079b9439f845486dc8273095c0bd95528774- SHA-1
7a8779c6b60a34e887aaef4640fcbcef6f30bad0- MD5
e3329fbb7a72a80fced7004069370222
About this file
GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar is an RAR file of 10.4 MB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 10.4 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 11, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar a virus?
What is GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
How do I remove GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
What kind of malware is GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of GTA6_LUCIA_NACKED.mp4.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.