File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is Krypton Client1. 21. 11. jar safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
The detection pattern strongly supports a Java Agent-style trojan: 19 of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including five major antivirus engines and 14…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already opened or ran it, follow the steps below.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't opened or run it
Don't open or run this Java file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened or ran it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full scan with your security software.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall the operating system.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
19 of 58 flagged
- Flagged 19
- No detection 39
- No result 17
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 21d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One sandbox run returned clean, but its T1055, T1543.002, and mappings add concern, and no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet agree on Java/Agent.ADG, while Avira and F-Secure use closely related Java Agent labels. The completed observation from the test run mapped possible process injection, service persistence, and defense impairment, although it did not identify an injected process or return a malicious sandbox verdict. The family naming is not consistent enough for a narrow strain attribution, so Java Agent is the most defensible umbrella family. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available, and the nine dropped files have no saved verdicts.
What We Detected
Nineteen of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this JAR. Five major antivirus engines detected it, with ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet naming Java/Agent.ADG and Avira and F-Secure using closely related JAVA.Agent labels. Fourteen independent engine detections make a single-vendor false alarm unlikely.
Threat Behavior
No injected target process was recorded, and the sandbox itself returned clean, so these mappings are supporting evidence rather than standalone proof. No sample-attributed network contacts were recorded, but a complete host-reputation cross-check is unavailable.
What To Do Now
Do not launch the JAR. Quarantine or remove it with security software kept enabled, and investigate any system where it already ran for unfamiliar services, Java processes, persistence changes, and security-control tampering.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The only completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no injected target process.
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match was found, although absence of such intelligence does not clear the file.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The single completed sandbox run returned clean.
- No injected target process was identified during observation from the test run.
- No researcher-intelligence or malware-exchange match was found.
- None of the nine dropped files has a saved malicious verdict.
- Nineteen of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it detected the file.
- Five major antivirus engines reported trojan detections.
- Fourteen independent detection sources reduce the likelihood of vendor duplication explaining the result.
- The test run mapped possible process injection, service persistence, and defense impairment.
- The file was first observed only 11 days before this analysis.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as downloading a file, but no download was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as creating a service; no new service was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
KryptonClient1.21.11.jar
7ee09d5fe21bd9046d530b517b85d3a6016f5a22ae39a6bf99f9cc09c856a28a
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
javaw.exe
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\download.jar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"" >> C:\cmdlinestart.log 2>&1
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
5300
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5300
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
16MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1027· Obfuscated code
- T1055· Process injection
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1064
- T1074
- T1082· System recon
- T1105· Network file transfer
- T1106
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1202
- T1518.001· Checks your AV
- T1543.002· Service install
- T1562.001· Disables security
- T1564· Hides artifacts
- T1564.001· Hides artifacts
- T1564.003· Hides artifacts
Observed activity
Processes started
3Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
javaw.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\download.jar"cmd.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"" >> C:\cmdlinestart.log 2>&1java.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"
Files
15Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5300 - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\6520 - Written
C:\cmdlinestart.log
Show all 15 entries for files
- Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
/proc/3571/coredump_filter - Written
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3571 - Written
/var/log/auth.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/dpkg.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/kern.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/syslog.1.gz - Deleted
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\5388 - Deleted
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3571
Sandbox background — not the file
12The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
icacls.exeC:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M - VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1 - VM process
gzip/bin/gzip - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c "\n\t\tinvoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart > /dev/null\n" logrotate_script "/var/log/cups/*log " - VM process
invoke-rc.d/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d invoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart - VM process
runlevel/sbin/runlevel
Show all 12 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-enabled cups.service - VM process
ls/usr/bin/ls ls /etc/rc[S2345].d/S[0-9][0-9]cups - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-active cups.service - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/syslog - VM process
rsyslog-rotate/usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl kill -s HUP rsyslog.service
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 4 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 4 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- ba66a7eb882079d6b3b5…6b4549Not checkedno saved verdict
- 0f9f6b03bdb19f837957…cc40ecNot checkedno saved verdict
- bc6336913678ab498d23…bf9a43Not checkedno saved verdict
- 9a419f0f2e14ce67b846…bb671dNot checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
19 of the 58 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 19
- Avira (major engine)TR/JAVA.Agent
- Emsisoft (major engine)Trojan.GenericKD.81676617 (B)
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Java/Agent.ADG trojan
- F-Secure (major engine)Trojan.TR/JAVA.Agent
- Fortinet (major engine)Java/Agent.ADG!tr
- GData (major engine)Trojan.GenericKD.81676617
- Symantec (major engine)Trojan.Gen.NPE
- AlibabaTrojan:JAVA/Generic.c38b2993
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 4:24 PM UTC
- SHA-256
7ee09d5fe21bd9046d530b517b85d3a6016f5a22ae39a6bf99f9cc09c856a28a- SHA-1
6a2c68b8111618abd175e30aa40e6b349b14bd56- MD5
7e0da296795c7fe8f1278b748403def5
About this file
KryptonClient1.21.11.jar is a JAR file of 5.6 MB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 5.6 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 28 distinct sources
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
19 of 58 engines flagged this file
17 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
The 19 detections come from 14 independent scan engines: several vendors license the same engine, so their results are one vote.
- Tier-113 engines5flagged7 vendors sharing 5 engines
- Tier-233 engines6flagged8 vendors sharing 6 engines
- Low-trust12 engines4flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AlibabaMalicious: Trojan:JAVA/Generic.c38b2993
- alibabacloudMalicious: Trojan:Java/Generic.Gen
- ArcabitMalicious: Trojan.Generic.D4DE4949
- AviraMalicious: TR/JAVA.Agent
- CTXMalicious: jar.trojan.java
- CynetMalicious: Malicious (score: 99)
- EmsisoftMalicious: Trojan.GenericKD.81676617 (B)
- ESET-NOD32Malicious: Java/Agent.ADG trojan
- F-SecureMalicious: Trojan.TR/JAVA.Agent
- FortinetMalicious: Java/Agent.ADG!tr
- GDataMalicious: Trojan.GenericKD.81676617
- huorongMalicious: Trojan/JAVA.Agent.u
- LionicMalicious: Trojan.ZIP.Java.4!c
- McAfeeDMalicious: ti!7EE09D5FE21B
- MicroWorld-eScanMalicious: Trojan.GenericKD.81676617
- SymantecMalicious: Trojan.Gen.NPE
- TencentMalicious: Java.Trojan.Generic.Bujl
- VaristMalicious: ABTrojan.JYYD-
- VIPREMalicious: Trojan.GenericKD.81676617
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- AvastNo result
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGNo result
- BitDefenderNo result
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CylanceNo result
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- GoogleNo result
- GridinsoftClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyNo result
- KingsoftClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- MicrosoftClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighNo result
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSNo result
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookClean
- VBA32Clean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is KryptonClient1.21.11.jar a virus?
What is KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
What should I do if I already opened or ran KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
How do I remove KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
What kind of malware is KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of KryptonClient1.21.11.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.