Is Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon safe?
A tier-1 engine and another detector corroborate a licensing-crack hacktool label, while the apparent Autodesk signature cannot be verified.
ESET-NOD32 and alibabacloud independently identify the executable as a crack-related hacktool, satisfying the confirmed-hacktool threshold. Although most engines remained silent and one sandbox issued no malicious verdict, the unverified Autodesk signature and observed service-related technique provide insufficient reassurance.
82be4ec8ba546ebf1e…e8a2d76ecbd6aeRecommended next actions
Before opening
Do not open it. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened it
Close it. If it opened links, requested credentials, or triggered unexpected behavior, disconnect from the internet and run a full device scan.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
ESET-NOD32 and alibabacloud independently identify the executable as a crack-related hacktool, satisfying the confirmed-hacktool threshold. Although most engines remained silent and one sandbox issued no malicious verdict, the unverified Autodesk signature and observed service-related technique provide insufficient reassurance.
Four of 72 engines flagged the executable, including ESET-NOD32 with a crack-related hacktool label. A second engine independently applied a matching crack label, so the hacktool identification is corroborated even without strong tier-1 family consensus. One sandbox observed T1543.003 and direct-IP connections, but it did not issue a malicious runtime verdict. The apparent Autodesk signer cannot be treated as trustworthy because verification is unavailable and the curated publisher match is false. High prevalence, clean-leaning engine results, and no identified malicious child reduce certainty about conventional trojan activity, but they do not neutralize the confirmed licensing-crack classification.
What We Detected
Four of 72 antivirus engines flagged this executable. ESET-NOD32 identified Win64/HackTool.Crack.DT, while alibabacloud independently identified HackTool:Win/Crack.DS; this corroboration satisfies the confirmed-hacktool criterion. Yandex and MaxSecure supplied less-specific trojan labels.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run observed service-related technique T1543.003 and numerous direct-IP connections. It did not produce a malicious sandbox verdict, and none of the three inspected child files was identified as malicious. Because contactedHosts is unavailable, no complete reputation result exists for those observed IP addresses.
Trust and Context
The executable presents an Autodesk signer name, but signing.verified is unavailable and signing.trustedPublisher.matched is false, so that identity is not a reliable trust signal. The sample is established, with 2,922 sources and 4,896 submissions since 2023, and most engines did not detect it. Those factors suggest this may be a crack or licensing-bypass component rather than a broadly detected commodity trojan, but confirmed offensive tooling remains unsafe to run.
What To Do Now
Do not execute or install this file on a production or personal system. Obtain Autodesk licensing components only through Autodesk's official installer or an authorized administrator, keep endpoint protection enabled, and quarantine or remove this copy.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- Only 4/72 engines flagged the sample, while 15 of 16 reporting tier-1 engines did not detect it.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false in the one completed sandbox run, and droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false across three inspected children.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.circl.hit=false provide no researcher-curated corroboration, although absence of such hits is not proof of harmlessness.
- The file is common and old, with 2,922 sources and 4,896 submissions since 2023.
- contactedHosts=null, so no complete reputation result is available for the observed IP contacts.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 4/72 engines detected the file
- 15 of 16 reporting tier-1 engines did not flag it
- No malicious sandbox verdict was recorded
- No malicious child was identified among three inspected files
- The hash has been widely submitted since 2023
- Confirmed crack-related hacktool labels from ESET-NOD32 and alibabacloud
- Apparent Autodesk signature is not verified
- Observed service-related technique T1543.003
- Direct-IP network activity lacks a complete host-reputation cross-check
- Two additional engines supplied generic trojan or Igent labels
Quarantine this copy and replace it with licensing software obtained directly from Autodesk or an authorized deployment source. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled, and scan the surrounding system for other cracking tools or unauthorized modifications.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete4 of 72 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial20 runtime contacts were observed without a completed reputation cross-check.
YARA
Complete1 signature or behavior rule matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 19MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 15spawned processes
- 20network contacts
- 19filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Created or modified a system service, which can keep code running.
High concern: Manipulated how the operating system loads code, which can redirect execution.
Moderate concern: Contained obfuscated or packed code that makes inspection harder.
Moderate concern: Runs hidden system commands (script or shell).
Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.
Moderate concern: Scans through your files and folders.
Moderate concern: Checked the environment for virtualisation or analysis tools.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Threat context
How hacktools are abused
This is a hacking or cracking tool — the kind used to bypass software licences, generate fake keys, or attack other systems. Even when the tool 'works', these downloads very often carry hidden malware.
Bottom line:Running one means trusting an anonymous author with full access to your PC — rarely worth the risk.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon
82be4ec8ba546ebf1e3448976d06e163e9c4e258301cfceb9ce8a2d76ecbd6ae
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\file.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
%SAMPLEPATH%\82be4ec8ba546ebf1e3448976d06e163e9c4e258301cfceb9ce8a2d76ecbd6ae.exe
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
ConDrv
\Device\ConDrv
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
Connect
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
a83f:8110:2800:1800:4000:1800:1800:100
Contact observed during runtime.
06Isolated runtime analysis - Contacted hostObserved
20.99.186.246
Contact observed during runtime.
07Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- a83f:8110:2800:1800:4000:1800:1800:100
- 20.99.186.246
- 192.229.211.108
- 23.216.147.62
- 20.99.184.37
- 20.99.133.109
- a83f:8110:0:0:1400:0:0:0
- 184.25.191.235
- 20.99.185.48
- 104.100.61.237
- \Device\ConDrv
- \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1344.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1400.tmp.csv
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1430.tmp.txt
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER196F.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER1980.tmp.csv
- Global\FNP_SERVERLOG_LOCK
- \Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\Global\FNP_SERVERLOG_LOCK
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 3 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.
- e447b39db1b27bde4deb…7d4535Never scannednever seen before
- a9649bff6b988ed74824…7e4144Never scannednever seen before
- f6f23a89c95b4f487b25…1e250eNever scannednever seen before
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 1rule hit recorded
- 4 / 72engines flagged
- 2,922sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
4 of 72 antivirus engines flagged the file, including alibabacloud and ESET-NOD32.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has a long, established submission history across 2,922 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSubmission historyObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 4,896 times from 2,922 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon — 82be4ec8ba546ebf1e3448976d06e163e9c4e258301cfceb9ce8a2d76ecbd6ae
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\file.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — %SAMPLEPATH%\82be4ec8ba546ebf1e3448976d06e163e9c4e258301cfceb9ce8a2d76ecbd6ae.exe
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: ConDrv — \Device\ConDrv
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: Connect — \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 09
Contacted host: a83f:8110:2800:1800:4000:1800:1800:100 — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 10
Contacted host: 20.99.186.246 — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: hacktool
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Behavioral heuristics matched patterns associated with malware. Corroborating evidence determines how much weight they carry.
The sample contacted an external IP address directly and no application domain was recorded. Direct-IP traffic also occurs in legitimate installers and infrastructure, so this is supporting context only and requires corroboration from host reputation and other runtime evidence.
Evidencea83f:8110:2800:1800:4000:1800:1800:100 · 20.99.186.246 · 192.229.211.108
4 of 72 engines flagged this file
View all 72 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- Signature not verified: Autodesk
- Size
- 2.7 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 8, 2026, 8:37 AM UTC
82be4ec8ba546ebf1e3448976d06e163e9c4e258301cfceb9ce8a2d76ecbd6aeSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file is dangerous. Treat it as harmful and remove it.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open this file. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
- Recovery step 02
If you already opened it, disconnect from the internet and start with a full antivirus scan or Microsoft Defender Offline scan. If compromise is suspected or the problem persists, use a reputable second-opinion scanner and follow incident-recovery or clean-reinstall guidance.
- Recovery step 03
If you typed any passwords while it was open, change them from a device you trust.
- Recovery step 04
Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon malware?
What is Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
How many antivirus engines detected Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
I already downloaded and opened Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon — what should I do?
How do I remove Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
What kind of malware is Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
Is Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
How up to date is this analysis of Autodesk Licensing Vendor Daemon?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.