File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is 6a1706dd. exe safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
Thirty-two of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this new unsigned executable, with multiple major antivirus engines identifying GameHack, adware, or generic trojan…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already ran it, uninstall it and anything that came with it.
What to do now4 steps
This is unwanted software (adware or a bundled program), not an infection. Remove it and undo any changes it made.
If you haven't installed it
Don't run this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin.
If you already ran it
Uninstall it and any program you don't recognise that arrived at the same time (Settings > Apps on Windows).
Remove browser extensions you didn't add, and reset your browser's home page, new-tab page and search engine if they changed.
Run a scan with your antivirus to catch anything bundled with it.
If you opened or installed it
Unwanted software is not a full infection, but it should go. These free MalwareTips guides show how to remove it.
- Remove adware and unwanted programsStop unwanted ads on Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
32 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 32
- No detection 39
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 12d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
6 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The file has broad antivirus detection: 32 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including six major detections and 24 independent engine votes.
Detection is broad rather than confined to rule or less reliable products: 32 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including six major detections and 24 independent votes. ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet converge on GameHack, while several other engines identify adware, riskware, or generic trojan traits. The executable is unsigned, has no publisher history, and was observed from only one source on its first day, leaving no credible provenance to offset those detections. Evidence from the test run mapped T1055, although it did not identify an injected process or exact method, and the single sandbox verdict was clean. No complete contacted-host reputation check is available, so network reputation cannot reduce the risk.
What We Detected
Thirty-two of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable. ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet identify GameHack or GameHack riskware, while BitDefender-family results identify adware and Avira reports a generic agent trojan.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean, but the saved evidence from the test run mapped MITRE T1055, which is associated with process injection. No target process appears in the evidence, so the exact technique remains unconfirmed. The run recorded no sample network contacts or dropped files; however, no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
Do not execute or install this file on a production or personal system. Keep security software enabled, quarantine or delete the file, and obtain the software only from a verified official source if it was expected.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The completed sandbox run returned clean and recorded no contacted domains, IPs, or URLs.
- No packer or high-entropy code was identified, and no malicious file it created was recorded.
- The GameHack family agreement is limited to two major antivirus engines rather than a strong major consensus.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- One completed sandbox run returned clean.
- No sample network contacts, persistence indicators, written files, or dropped files were recorded in that run.
- The antivirus analysis found no packer and no high-entropy code.
- Researcher-curated external feeds provided no corroborating family hit.
- Thirty-two of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including six major detections.
- Twenty-four independent engine votes indicate the detections are not merely duplicated vendor results.
- Multiple products identify GameHack, adware, or riskware characteristics.
- The executable is unsigned and has no established publisher history.
- It is and has been submitted by only one source.
- The test run mapped possible process injection, though no target process was identified.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 19sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the network settings of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as recording keystrokes; no keylogging was confirmed.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How bundlers and adware work
This is a bundler: a real-looking installer that hides extra software inside. When you run it, it installs things you never asked for, such as ad injectors, browser toolbars or fake 'PC cleaner' apps. The people behind it get paid for every app it installs.
Bottom line:It is not usually built to destroy files, but it slows the PC, floods it with ads and can be hard to remove completely.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 3: FileSeen in the test run
6a1706dd.exe
968d56964f29aba3a20626179815bb4c811a218a4aa766f7d6bedab131010c1e
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 3: ProcessSeen in the test run
6a1706dd.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\6a1706dd.exe" -install
Test run - Evidence 3 of 3: ProcessSeen in the test run
6a1706dd.exe
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\6a1706dd.exe" /install
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
3 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 19 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
32 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 32
- Avast (major engine)Win64:MalwareX-gen [Misc]
- AVG (major engine)Win64:MalwareX-gen [Misc]
- Avira (major engine)TR/W64.Agent
- BitDefender (major engine)Adware.GenericKD.61165561
- Emsisoft (major engine)Adware.GenericKD.61165561 (B)
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Win64/Riskware.GameHack.BU application
- F-Secure (major engine)Trojan.TR/W64.Agent
- Fortinet (major engine)Riskware/GameHack
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 13, 2026, 9:45 PM UTC
- SHA-256
968d56964f29aba3a20626179815bb4c811a218a4aa766f7d6bedab131010c1e- SHA-1
c6651295ddeb8c7ae2c400e13002c8e6b81bddef- MD5
5124398227563fe08e0f091e0a57c9b3
About this file
6a1706dd.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 1.4 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 1.4 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 13, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 6.56 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is 6a1706dd.exe a virus?
What is 6a1706dd.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected 6a1706dd.exe?
What should I do if I already ran 6a1706dd.exe?
How do I remove 6a1706dd.exe?
What kind of program is 6a1706dd.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of 6a1706dd.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of 6a1706dd.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.