File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is firmware_ upgrade_ utility. exe safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
Family labels are inconsistent and the sandbox verdict itself was clean, so the exact malware family remains unconfirmed despite the substantial risk.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already ran it, follow the steps below.
What to do now4 steps
This file is harmful. Don't run it, and remove it.
If you haven't run it
Don't run this file. Delete it, then empty the Recycle Bin.
If you already ran it
Disconnect the device from the internet, then run a full antivirus scan. Microsoft Defender Offline (Windows Security > Virus & threat protection > Scan options) also finds malware that hides while Windows runs.
If you typed passwords on the device after running it, change them from another device you trust.
If the scan keeps finding it, or the device still acts strangely, scan again with a second-opinion scanner from another company; if that doesn't fix it, back up your personal files and reinstall Windows.
If you already ran it, do these in order.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
24 of 72 flagged
- Flagged 24
- No detection 48
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Twenty-four of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, representing 23 deduplicated detection votes and including four major detections. Microsoft named Wacatac, while Avast and AVG reported DangerousSig; because Avast and AVG share technology and the broader labels differ, there is no strong family consensus. The executable is unsigned and contains high-entropy code consistent with packing, which reinforces the detection evidence. The completed sandbox verdict was clean and the fully covered host-reputation check found no known harmful destinations, but those counter-signals do not adequately explain the process injection and broad engine response.
What We Detected
Twenty-four of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, with 23 deduplicated detection votes. Microsoft reported Wacatac, Avast and AVG reported DangerousSig, and several other engines used Agent or generic trojan labels. The file has no verified publisher signature and contains a high-entropy UPX-style section consistent with packing.
Threat Behavior
The completed sandbox run recorded MITRE T1055 process injection into WMIADAP.EXE and T1560 archive-related behavior. It also observed USB and drive enumeration consistent with a firmware utility, so not every action is inherently hostile.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file on a production system or attach a device to it. Keep security software enabled, let your antivirus remove the executable, and obtain a fresh copy only from the hardware manufacturer's verified support channel before comparing hashes or signatures.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The completed reputation cross-check covered the observed hosts and found no cached malicious or suspicious destinations; several contacts were analysis-environment background traffic.
- Four dropped files lack saved verdicts, so they provide no corroborating file it created classification.
- Twelve major antivirus engines did not flag the file, and the four major detections do not establish a strong family consensus.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The completed sandbox run returned a clean overall verdict.
- The complete observed-host reputation check found no known malicious or suspicious destinations.
- No inspected file it created has a saved harmful verdict.
- Twelve major antivirus engines did not flag the file.
- Twenty-four of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including four major detections.
- The executable is unsigned and lacks an established publisher history.
- High-entropy executable code indicates packing or substantial code concealment.
- Engine labels include Wacatac, DangerousSig, Agent, and generic trojan classifications.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 14sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 1network contact
- 19filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Note: Looked through folders on the test computer (most installers do this).
Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as spreading through USB drives; nothing confirms it.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan pretends to be something useful or harmless so that you run it. Once open, it does its real job in the background, from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 6: FileSeen in the test run
firmware_upgrade_utility.exe
d70a91d000f1a15411a6636d018412455ea163bbc86c203d8eacc32dbe19d65f
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
HORI_2115_V097.exe
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\HORI_2115_V097.exe"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
HORI_2115_V097.exe
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
config.ini
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\6004_14653\data\config.ini
Test run - Evidence 5 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
HORI_2115_V097_Key.fw
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\6004_14653\data\HORI_2115_V097_Key.fw
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 1
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 6: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
23.54.127.209
Contacted during the test run.
Test run
6 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 14 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 4 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
24 of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 24
- Avast (major engine)Win32:DangerousSig [Trj]
- AVG (major engine)Win32:DangerousSig [Trj]
- Fortinet (major engine)W32/PossibleThreat
- Microsoft (major engine)Trojan:Win32/Wacatac.B!ml
- Symantec (major engine)ML.Attribute.HighConfidence
- TrellixENS (major engine)Artemis!9E58EF4E3E0D
- AhnLab-V3Trojan/Win.Generic.R682264
- AlibabaTrojan:Win32/DangerousSig.0ff152cf
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 13, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC
- SHA-256
d70a91d000f1a15411a6636d018412455ea163bbc86c203d8eacc32dbe19d65f- SHA-1
fad76565477be0a074c29686bd8dbba95b253827- MD5
9e58ef4e3e0d140894d5c842e673ff80
About this file
firmware_upgrade_utility.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 7.0 MB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 7.0 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jan 3, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 4 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- UPX (section names)Packing hides code; legitimate installers use it too.
- Entropy
- 7.93 of 8A code section is highly compressed or encrypted.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (76), 12 matched signature rules, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 9 questions people ask most about this file.
Is firmware_upgrade_utility.exe a virus?
What is firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
What should I do if I already ran firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
How do I remove firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
What kind of malware is firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
Is firmware_upgrade_utility.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of firmware_upgrade_utility.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.