File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is X86 & X64. rar safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
The archive drew 17 detections among 75 engines, including eight from major antivirus engines and repeated AVBDiscSoft naming.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
If you already opened or extracted it, uninstall it and anything that came with it.
What to do now4 steps
This is unwanted software (adware or a bundled program), not an infection. Remove it and undo any changes it made.
If you haven't installed it
Don't open or extract this archive. Delete the archive and any files you extracted from it, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened or extracted it
Uninstall it and any program you don't recognise that arrived at the same time (Settings > Apps on Windows).
Remove browser extensions you didn't add, and reset your browser's home page, new-tab page and search engine if they changed.
Run a scan with your antivirus to catch anything bundled with it.
If you opened or installed it
Unwanted software is not a full infection, but it should go. These free MalwareTips guides show how to remove it.
- Remove adware and unwanted programsStop unwanted ads on Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
17 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 17
- No detection 45
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 24d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The test run also mapped defense impairment and showed a temporary DLL launched through rundll32.exe; do not extract or run its contents.
Detection is broad: 17 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, representing 15 independent engine votes and eight major findings. ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet associate it with AVBDiscSoft, although other products alternate between unwanted program, riskware, and generic trojan labels. The sandbox did not issue an explicit malicious result, and several major antivirus engines remained silent, but those counter-signals do not outweigh the breadth of detections and offensive behavior in the test run. The three extracted children lack saved verdicts, and no complete contacted-host reputation check is available.
What We Detected
Seventeen of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the RAR archive, with 15 independent detections and eight major findings. ESET-NOD32 and Fortinet named AVBDiscSoft, while Microsoft and GData used trojan labels; several others classified the contents as a potentially unwanted application or riskware.
Threat Behavior
The archive extracted an executable and DLL into a temporary directory, after which rundll32.exe loaded reWASDCommon.dll. Runtime mapping included T1562.001, which represents impairment of defenses. The only observed IP contact was identified as analysis-environment background traffic, not sample activity, and no complete host-reputation cross-check is available. Three extracted files were inspected, but none has a saved verdict, so their safety remains unresolved.
What To Do Now
Do not open, extract, or execute this archive. Keep security software enabled, quarantine or delete the file, and run a full system scan if any contents were already launched. If execution occurred, review temporary files and recent security-control changes on the affected system.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- Seven major antivirus engines did not flag the archive, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, DrWeb, Emsisoft, and Ikarus.
- Several prominent detections describe the contents as a potentially unwanted application or riskware rather than a conventional trojan.
- The completed sandbox run did not return an explicit malicious verdict, and no persistence indicators or sample-attributed network contacts were recorded.
- No malware-specific YARAify rule or MalwareBazaar record corroborated the detections.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Seven major antivirus engines did not flag the archive.
- The sandbox produced no explicit malicious verdict and observed no persistence indicators.
- No malware-specific researcher rules or established malware-feed record matched the hash.
- Seventeen of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it detected the archive, including eight major antivirus engines.
- Multiple engines associated the contents with AVBDiscSoft, while others used trojan or riskware labels.
- The test run mapped an attempt to impair defenses.
- A DLL extracted into a temporary directory was launched through the Windows rundll32 utility.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 7sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 6filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How bundlers and adware work
This is a bundler: a real-looking installer that hides extra software inside. When you run it, it installs things you never asked for, such as ad injectors, browser toolbars or fake 'PC cleaner' apps. The people behind it get paid for every app it installs.
Bottom line:It is not usually built to destroy files, but it slows the PC, floods it with ads and can be hard to remove completely.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
X86 & X64.rar
f3e78e9f351365bb8b1aee78d54a86452f8b36168bc61dcb2556244079d66575
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
rundll32.exe
"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\reWASDCommon.dll",#1
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
unarchiver.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\unarchiver.exe "C:\Windows\SysWow64\unarchiver.exe" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\X86 & X64.rar"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
tjurwwii.hs1
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\tjurwwii.hs1
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
reWASD700-8447.exe
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\tjurwwii.hs1\reWASD700-8447.exe
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 7 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 3 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
17 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 17
- Avast (major engine)Other:PUP-gen [PUP]
- AVG (major engine)Other:PUP-gen [PUP]
- Avira (major engine)PUA/PUP
- ESET-NOD32 (major engine)Win32/AVBDiscSoft.C potentially unwanted application
- F-Secure (major engine)PotentialRisk.PUA/PUP
- Fortinet (major engine)Riskware/AVBDiscSoft
- GData (major engine)Archive.Trojan.Agent.IN9326
- Microsoft (major engine)Trojan:Win32/Suschil!rfn
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 12:09 PM UTC
- SHA-256
f3e78e9f351365bb8b1aee78d54a86452f8b36168bc61dcb2556244079d66575- SHA-1
6e30cd84ea4b85d266405378a6e9ef2b6381c6e6- MD5
390669973dad0a7adb7a64f101564367
About this file
X86 & X64.rar is an RAR file of 53.4 MB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 53.4 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 2, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 5 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is X86 & X64.rar a virus?
What is X86 & X64.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected X86 & X64.rar?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted X86 & X64.rar?
How do I remove X86 & X64.rar?
What kind of program is X86 & X64.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of X86 & X64.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of X86 & X64.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.